However, I consider that the Committee engages in
questionable discussion when, in paragraph 16.3, it
assesses the suffering caused by cyanide gas and takes
into consideration the duration of the agony, which it
deems unacceptable when it lasts for over 10 minutes.
with its role as a body monitoring an international human
rights instrument.
Should it be concluded, conversely, that the
Committee would find no violation of article 7 if the
agony lasted nine minutes?
A strict interpretation of article 6 along the lines I
have set out previously which would exclude any
"authorization" to maintain or restore the death penalty,
would enable the Committee to avoid this intractable
debate on the ways in which the death penalty is carried
out in the States parties.
By engaging in this debate, the Committee finds
itself obliged to take positions that are scarcely compatible
[French original]
Communication No. 470/1991
Submitted by: Joseph Kindler on 25 September 1991 (represented by counsel)
Alleged victim: The author
State party: Canada
Declared inadmissible: 31 July 1992 (forty-fifth session)
Date of adoption of Views: 30 July 1993 (forty-eighth session)*
2.2 Article 6 of the 1976 Extradition Treaty
between Canada and the United States provides:
Subject matter: Extradition of author by State to
another jurisdiction where author faces the
death penalty
"When the offence for which extradition is
requested is punishable by death under the laws of
the requesting State and the laws of the requested
State do not permit such punishment for that
offence, extradition may be refused unless the
requesting State provides such assurances as the
requested State considers sufficient that the death
penalty shall not be imposed or, if imposed, shall
not be executed".
Procedural issues: Non-compliance with the
Committee’s request for interim measures of
protection – Court’s evaluation of facts and
evidence – Lack of substantiation of claim –
Travaux préparatoires
Substantive issues: Right to life – Torture and
inhuman treatment – Extradition to face the
death penalty
Canada abolished the death penalty in 1976, except
in the case of certain military offences.
Articles of the Covenant: 2, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14 and 26
Article of the Optional Protocol: 2
2.3 The power to seek assurances that the death
penalty will not be imposed is conferred on the
Minister of Justice pursuant to section 25 of the 1985
Extradition Act. On 17 January 1986, after hearing
the author's counsel, the Minister of Justice decided
not to seek these assurances.
1.
The author of the communication is Joseph
Kindler, a citizen of the United States of America,
born in 1961, at the time of his submission detained
in a penitentiary in Montreal, Canada, and on
26 September 1991 extradited to the United States.
He claims to be a victim of a violation of articles 6,
7, 9, 10, 14 and 26 of the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights. He is represented by
counsel.
2.4 The author filed an application for review of
the Minister's decision with the Federal Court, which
dismissed the application in January 1987. The
author's appeal to the Court of Appeal was rejected
in December 1988. The matter then came before the
Supreme Court of Canada, which decided on
26 September 1991 that the extradition of
Mr. Kindler would not violate his rights under the
Canadian Charter of Human Rights. The author was
extradited on the same day.
Facts as submitted by the author
2.1 In November 1983 the author was convicted
in the State of Pennsylvania, United States, of first
degree murder and kidnapping; the jury
recommended the death sentence. According to the
author, this recommendation is binding on the court.
In September 1984, prior to sentencing, the author
escaped from custody. He was arrested in the
province of Quebec in April 1985. In July 1985 the
United States requested and in August 1985 the
Superior Court of Quebec ordered his extradition.
Complaint
3.
The author claims that the decision to
extradite him violates articles 6, 7, 9, 14 and 26 of
the Covenant. He submits that the death penalty per
se constitutes cruel and inhuman treatment or
punishment, and that conditions on death row are
113
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents