E/CN.4/2001/66/Add.2
page 14
and another, in the guards’ office in Block Four, behind the curtains. Various explanations
were given by the authorities: they were broken pieces of furniture, bars used to check the cell
bars or bars broken off by the prisoners themselves with a view to using them as weapons during
revolts.
36.
The Special Rapporteur was later informed of the intention of the Secretary of State in
charge of the penitentiary system to divide the Casa de Detenção into four units headed by
four different directors, who were said to have already been identified, with a view to exercising
better control over the inmate population. Furthermore, it is believed that Block Four will soon
become a prison hospital.
37.
On 26 August, the Special Rapporteur visited one of the three women’s penitentiaries of
the State of São Paulo, Prisão Feminina de Tatuapé, where 446 women were said to be held.
The official capacity of the prison was said to be 600, although the Director of Security, who was
in charge of the prison at the time of the Special Rapporteur’s visit, said that the real limit should
be 450. She drew the attention of the Special Rapporteur to the problem of the scarcity of
personnel and its security implications. She complained that she had only 20 guards per shift at
her disposal because a large number of guards were on sick leave, mostly owing to the harsh
working conditions. Most of the guards were said to be women, but some were men, including
astonishingly, the son of the General Director. On the day of the visit, there were 15 female
and 4 male guards. Only one vehicle was at their disposal to transfer prisoners to court, other
prisons or to hospital. Women were said not to be separated according to their age or crime and
to work from 7.00 a.m. to 12.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. to 5.00 p.m. for a salary of 115 reais per
month. According to the detainees, they were in fact receiving only 60 reais. They were held
five per cell measuring 8-10 square metres. Each cell contained mattresses and a toilet, the
showers being separate from the cells. The cells were clean and detainees had made some basic
improvements, such as placing curtains in front of the beds for privacy. The Special Rapporteur
visited the infirmary where a detainee who had very recently given birth was held. She believed
that her baby was going to be taken from her and that she would not see her child again.
38.
The Special Rapporteur visited the punishment cells (castigo) of Block Two which were
similar to other cells except that there was no toilet. Detainees indicated that they were let out of
their cells at the whim of the guards. Some detainees claimed to be “in transit”, i.e. transferred,
about once a month to a different penitentiary and that their relatives were not informed. In the
dirty punishment cells of Block Five, the Special Rapporteur met three women who were sharing
two mattresses. A 20-year-old woman had allegedly been beaten by the Director’s son, who was
said to be a guard and had access to all sections of the prison at any time. Her right shoulder and
hand bore marks of beatings (haematomas) consistent with her allegations. She also believed
that she was “in transit” since she had been moved from one prison to another every month,
which prevented her family visiting her. In another cell, a young detainee refused to speak to the
Special Rapporteur for fear of reprisal. She nevertheless indicated to a member of the Special
Rapporteur’s team that she had been sexually abused by a male prison official whom she
identified, but was too fearful to authorize the Special Rapporteur to name.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents