Bibliography International Council on Human Rights Policy (ICHRP), Performance and Legitimacy: National human rights institutions (2nd edn, 2004) <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1551235_ code1427131.pdf?abstractid=1551235&mirid=1>. Jackson P and McKergow M, Solutions Focus, The simple way to positive change (Nicholas Brealey Publishing 2002). Jenkins-Smith H and others, ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework – Foundations, Evolution and Ongoing Research’ in Sabatier P and Weible Ch, Theories of the policy process (3rd edn, Boulder/Westview 2014). Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights, Official opinion regarding the establishment of the NPM submitted to Parliament on 4 July 2011 <http://www.parlament.gv.at/PAKT/VHG/XXIV/SNME/SNME_06859/ imfname_224762.pdf>. Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Menschenrechte (BIM) and Human Rights Implementation Centre (HRIC), ‘Baseline study on follow-up of NPMs in the EU’ (internal document, November 2014). Mahmood J, ‘Getting Recommendations implemented’ in APT Global Forum on the OPCAT February 2012 <http://www.apt.ch/content/files/opcat%20forum/Jeehan_Mahmood_Session5.pdf>. McCombs M, ‘A Look at Agenda-setting: past, present and future’ (2005) 6 (4) Journalism Studies 543. Midgley M, ‘Towards an ethic of global responsibility’ in Dunne T and Wheeler NJ (eds), Human Rights in Gobal Politics (1999). Miles S, ‘Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused?’ (2012) 108 Journal of Business Ethics 285. Organizational Research Services, A guide to measuring advocacy and policy. Prepared for the Annie E. Casey Foundation (WA 2007) <http://www.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/aecf-aguidetomeasuringpolicyandad vocacy-2007.pdf>.  Poland, Human Rights Defender, Report on the activities of the Human Rights Defender on the activities of the National Preventive Mechanism in Poland in 2012 (2013) <https://www.rpo.gov.pl/sites/default/ files/Report%20of%20the%20Human%20Rights%20Defender%20%28Ombudsman%29%20on%20 the%20Activities%20of%20the%20National%20Preventive%20Mechanism%20in%20Poland%20in%20 2012.pdf>. Retolaza I, Theory of Change, A thinking and action approach to navigate in the complexity of social change processes (2011) <http://bistandstorget.no/files/docs/ToC_Handbook_FINAL.pdf>. Slovenia, Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia, Annual Report of the Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia for 2013 (2014) <http://www.varuh-rs.si/fileadmin/user_upload/ pdf/lp/LP2013_ANG.pdf>.  Slovenia, Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia, Implementation of the duties and powers of the NPM in 2013 (2014) <http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/OPCAT/NPM/ NPMSlovenia2013.pdf>. Spain, Ombudsman Institution, Annual Report 2012 (2013) <http://defensordelpueblo.es/en/Mnp/ Defensor/anuales.html>. Stachowiak S, Pathways to Change: 10 Theories to Inform Advocacy and Policy Change Efforts (2013) <http://orsimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Center_Pathways_FINAL.pdf> <http://www. evaluationinnovation.org/sites/default/files/Pathways%20for%20Change.pdf>. Stein and Valters, Understanding ‘Theory of change’ in international development: a review of existing knowledge (Asia Foundation and London School of Economics 2012) <http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/pdf/outputs/ JSRP/ToC_Lit_Review.pdf>. The Netherlands, National Preventive Mechanisms, Second Annual Report 2012, 27 <http://www2.ohchr. org/english/bodies/cat/opcat/docs/NetherlandsAnnualReport2012.pdf> Tversky A, Kahneman D, ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice’ (1981) 211 (4481) Science, New Series, 453. - 116 -