on apprehension states that he was apprehended on 20 June 2014 at 23:22 at the premises of investigations unit of Shevchenkivske district directorate of the Main MIA Directorate in Kyiv (office 312) by an investigator of the district directorate T. At the same time, the alleged crime took place on 18 June 2014. Consequently, apprehension of a minor without a ruling of an investigating judge or court took place 2 days after the alleged crime. Another typical example of apprehension in violation of these requirements was found at Shevchenkivske district directorate of the Main MIA Directorate in Kyiv. 52

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents