on apprehension states that he was apprehended on 20 June 2014 at 23:22 at the
premises of investigations unit of Shevchenkivske district directorate of the Main MIA
Directorate in Kyiv (office 312) by an investigator of the district directorate T. At the
same time, the alleged crime took place on 18 June 2014. Consequently, apprehension
of a minor without a ruling of an investigating judge or court took place 2 days after
the alleged crime.
Another typical example of apprehension in violation of these requirements
was found at Shevchenkivske district directorate of the Main MIA Directorate in
Kyiv.
52
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents