enable it to take all necessary measures to comply with the provisions of article 3 of the Convention. These solutions may be of a legal nature (e.g. decision to admit the applicant temporarily), but also of a political nature (e.g. action to find a third State willing to admit the applicant to its territory and undertaking not to return or expel him in its turn). Due date for State party response None Date of reply 25 May 2005 State party response Pursuant to the Committee’s request of 25 March 2005 for follow-up information, the State party informed the Committee that the complainants had been admitted as refugees on 8 July 1997. On 5 June 2003, they were granted residence permits on humanitarian grounds. For this reason, Mr. Aemei renounced his refugee status on 5 June 2003. One of their children acquired Swiss nationality. Complainant’s response None Committee’s decision No further consideration under the follow-up procedure as the State party has complied with the Committee’s decision. Case 262/2005, V.L. Nationality and country of removal if applicable Belarusian to Belarus Views adopted on 20 November 2006 Issues and violations found Removal - article 3 Interim measures granted and State party response Granted and acceded to by the State party. Remedy recommended The complainant’s removal to Belarus by the State party would constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention 10. The Committee urges the State party, in accordance with rule 112, paragraph 5, of its 151