In view of the above, the NMPT is of the opinion that the guidelines and the measures taken
were too general and insufficient. The juvenile educational centres required greater support from the
government and the authorities managing and supervising the centres’ operation. Therefore, the
Commissioner for Human Rights called on the Minister of Education and Science to pay attention to the
situation of juveniles held in juvenile educational centres during the pandemic crisis295.
During the pandemic, two systems of isolation were used in the Juvenile Educational Centre in
Mszana Dolna. During the school year, when there were more newly arriving juveniles, a so-called
quarantine group was established. It used two adjusted rooms normally used by one of the educational
groups. Meals were delivered to the group members by the JEC’s staff member. The juveniles were not
isolated in their rooms and were in contact with other newly admitted juveniles within the quarantine
group. They slept in their bedrooms but spent time together, played games, talked to each other and
watched TV. Their body temperature was checked at least twice a day. The staff and the juveniles
reported that in some case the temperature was checked more frequently e.g. when someone’s was over
37 degrees Celsius. The juveniles had a computer with access to the internet, and could freely use
facebook and the messenger communicator. They had access to e-mail service and a telephone (both the
JEC telephone and their private mobile telephones). The juveniles did not go out for a walk during
isolation. At least once per hour, the boys were visited by a staff member - an educator, a teacher or a
psychologist. The psychologist had spoken to each of them on admission, and offered to speak to them
during the isolation period. The boys were not visited by a doctor or a nurse as there is no medical staff
employed directly by the JEC.
Later, when there were fewer newly admitted juveniles, two separate isolation rooms (with
access to a bathroom) were used for them. The boys were not placed in a quarantine group but stayed in
isolation rooms by themselves. They had no contact with each other. The rooms in which they stayed
had a bed, a table, a chair and a cabinet. The windows had no bars. Only one of the rooms had a computer
with internet access. The juveniles emphasized that there was quite a lot of space and that they could
exercise easily in their rooms. There was a calling system in the rooms. As in the case of the quarantine
group, the isolation period was from 7 to 14 days (usually after one week the juveniles could leave their
rooms). However, they did not meet with the rest of the group but had to return to their rooms. The
rooms were not monitored. The system of the visits and temperature checks was the same as in the
quarantine group. The staff informed that had the number of newly arriving juveniles been larger (at
least three), they would have established a quarantine group again. It would also be possible to have
both a quarantine group and the isolation rooms operating simultaneously.
295
See: general intervention letter of the Commissioner for Human Rights of 16 November 2020, file ref. no.
KMP.573.11.2020. The content of the letter and of the response of the Ministry of National Education is described
herein below, in a separate part of the report.
110
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents