Guidebook • Bizeps, ‘Volksanwältin Brinek: „Qualität von psychiatrischen Gutachten muss verbessert werden“‘ (18 September 2018) <www.bizeps.or.at/volksanwaeltin-brinek-qualitaet-vonpsychiatrischen-gutachten-muss-verbessert-werden/> accessed 30 October 2018 • Carver R, ‘A new Answer to an Old Question: National Human Rights Institutions and the Domestication of International Law' [2010] 10 HRLR 25 • Carver R, Handley L (eds), Does Torture Prevention Work? (Liverpool University Press 2016) • Carver R, ‘One NHRIs or Many? How many Institutions Does it Take to protect human rights? Lessons from the European Experience’, Journal of Human Rights Practice 3 (2011) • 112 Cerny M, Krammer R, Nachprüfende Verwaltungskontrolle und Präventive Menschenrechtskontrolle Kurzskriptum: Kurzskriptum zur Präsentation des Volksanwaltschaftsmoduls in der Polizeigrundausbildung [Lecture notes for the basic police training on the Austrian Ombudsman’s mandate] (Schriftenreihe der Volksanwaltschaft – Volume IV, 2017) • European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), ‘A brief introduction to investigative interviewing’ (2018) • CPT, ‘Access to a lawyer as a means of preventing ill-treatment: Extract from the 21st General Report of the CPT’ (2011) CPT/Inf(2011)28-part1 • CPT, ‘28th General Report of the CPT’ (2018) CPT/Inf(2019) 9 • CPT, ‘Report to the United Kingdom’ (2002) CPT/Inf (2002) 6 • CPT, ‘Report to Spain’ (2013) CPT/Inf (2013) 6 • CPT, ‘Report to Norway’ (2019) CPT/Inf (2019) 1 • CPT, ‘Juveniles deprived of their liberty under criminal legislation: Extract from the 24th General Report of the CPT’ (2015) CPT/Inf(2015)1-part rev1. • CRPD Committee, ‘Guidelines on independent monitoring frameworks and their participation in the work of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ (2016) CRPD/C/1/Rev.1, Annex • Council of the European Union, ‘Programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters’ OJ C 12, 15 January 2001 • Council of the European Union, ‘Resolution of the Council of 30 November 2009 on a Roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected or accused persons in criminal proceedings (Text with EEA relevance)’ OJ C 295, 4 December 2009 • Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland, ‘Police Custody: The detention of persons in police custody in Northern Ireland’ (March 2016) <www.rqia.org.uk/RQIA/ files/16/16b4138d-4716-4325-9a2a-382930cf615e.pdf> accessed 30 October 2018 • Convention against Torture Initiative (CTI), ‘CTI Training Tools 1/2017: ‘Investigative Interviewing for Criminal Cases’ (CTI 2017) • De Beco G, Article 33 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities National Structures for the Implementation and Monitoring of the Convention (Brill 30 May 2013) BIBLIOGRAPHY • De Beco G, Murray R, A Commentary on the Paris Principles on National Human Rights Institutions (Cambridge University Press 2014) • De Beco G, ‘Article 33(2) of the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: another role for National Human Rights Institutions?’ (2011) 29 NQHR pp. 84-106 • Bodnar A, ‘The situation of the Rule of Law in Poland, in particular as regards the independence of the judiciary’ (20 November 2018) <https://www.rpo.gov.pl/en/content/adambodnar-public-hearing-%E2%80%9C-situation-rule-law-poland-particular-regards-independence-judiciary> accessed 6 December 2019 • European Network of National Human Rights Institutions (ENNHRI), ‘Guide on Third Party Interventions before the European Court of Human Rights’ (forthcoming) • ENNHRI, ‘Guide on Third Party Interventions Before the Court of Justice of the European Union’ (forthcoming) • ENNHRI, ’Strategic Plan 2014-2017’ <http://ennhri.all2all.org/IMG/pdf/ennhri_strategicplan_web-2.pdf> accessed 30 October 2018 • ENNHRI, ‘Strategic Plan 2018-2021’ <http://ennhri.org/IMG/pdf/ennhri__strategicplan_2018-21.pdf> accessed 30 October 2018 • ENNHRI, Written observations in ECtHR, Strøbye v. Denmark and Rosenlind v. Denmark, No. 25802/18 and 27338/18 <http://ennhri.org/IMG/pdf/ennhri_submission_to_ecthr_ on_strobye_v._denmark_and_rosenlind_v._denmark.pdf> accessed 6 December 2019 • EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), ‘National Human Rights Institutions in the EU Member States: Strengthening the fundamental rights architecture of the EU I’ (FRA 2010) • FRA, ‘Rights in practice: Access to a lawyer and procedural rights in criminal and EAW proceedings’ (FRA 2019) • FRA, ‘Rights of suspected or accused persons across the EU: translation, interpretation and information in criminal proceedings’ (FRA 2016) • European Commission (EC), ‘Strengthening mutual trust in the European judicial area – A Green Paper on the application of EU criminal justice legislation in the field of detention’, COM/2011/0327 final • EC, ‘Commission Recommendation of 27 November 2013 on the right to legal aid for suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings’ OJ C 378, 24 December 2013 • EC, ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third person informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty’ (2019) COM(2019) 560 final • EC, ‘Green Paper on Procedural Safeguards for Suspects and Defendants in Criminal Proceedings throughout the European Union’ (2003) COM/2003/75 final 113