Guidebook • European Council, Tampere European Council Presidency Conclusions, 1999 • • European Council, ‘The Stockholm Programme — An Open and Secure Europe Serving and Protecting Citizens’ (2010) 2010/C 115/01 Hungarian Commissioner for Fundamental Rights, Report in case No. AJB-3107/2012 and in case No. AJB-3464/2012 • Hungarian Commissioner for Fundamental Right, Report in case No. AJB-3203/2012 • Hungarian Commissioner for Fundamental Right, Annual Report of the NPM of 2018 • International Council on Human Rights Policy and Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), ‘Assessing the Effectiveness of National Human Rights Institutions’ (International Council on Human Rights Policy 2005) <https://www. ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/NHRIen.pdf> accessed 6 December 2019 • Irish Equality and Human Rights Commission, Submission in the Case Sweeney v. Minister for Justice, Ireland and the Attorney General (12 March 2019) <https://www.ihrec.ie/documents/24211/> accessed 11 December 2019 • JUSTICE, ‘To Assist the Court: Third Party Interventions in the Public Interest’ (2016) <ht tps://2bquk8cdew6192t su41lay8t-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content /uploads/2016/06/To-Assist-the-Court-Web.pdf> accessed 6 December 2019 • Kanev, ‘Right to a Lawyer and to Legal aid in Criminal Proceedings in Five European Jurisdictions: Comparative Report’ (2018) • Kneihs and Lienbacher (eds), Rill-Schäffer-Kommentar Bundesverfassungsrecht, Art 148a B-VG (2017) • Kolendowska-Matejczuk M, Konstytucyjne prawo do obrony: w działalności Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich [Constitutional Right to Defence in the Activity of the Human Rights Defender] (Biuro Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich 2013) • Kolendowska-Matejczuk M, Szwarc K (eds.), Prawo do obrony w postępowaniu penalnym: Wybrane aspekty [Selected aspects on the right to defence in penal procedure] (Biuro Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich 2014) • Kozma J and Rachlew, ‘Combating Torture during Police Custody and Pre-Trial Detention’ (2018) <https://rm.coe.int/1680797130> accessed 11 December 2019 • Kucsko-Stadlmayer G, ‘European Ombudsman-Institutions: A Comparative Legal Analysis regarding the Multifaceted Realisation of an Idea’ (Springer 2008) • Lenaerts K, ‘The Principle of Mutual Recognition in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice’ (2015) • Lloyd-Cape E, ‘Inside Police Custody 2: An empirical study of suspects’ rights at the investigative stage of the criminal process in nine EU countries’ (2018) <https://www.fairtrials. org/sites/default/files/publication_pdf/Inside-Police-Custody-2-JUSTICIA-ComparativeReport.pdf> accessed 11 December 2019 • Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights (BIM) and Human Rights Implementation Centre of the University of Bristol (HRIC), ‘Enhancing Impact of National Preventive Mechanisms. Strengthening the follow-up on NPM recommendations in the EU: Strategic development, current practices and the way forward’ (May 2015) • Marcisz P, ‘Creating a Safe Venue of Judicial Review. AG Tanchev on the Admissibility of • • • • 114 BIBLIOGRAPHY European Parliament, ‘The End of the Transition Period for Police and Criminal Justice Measures Adopted before the Lisbon Treaty. Who Monitors Trust in the European Justice Area?’ (2014) <www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2014/509998/IPOL_ STU(2014)509998_EN.pdf> accessed 30 October 2018 European Group of NHRI, Amicus Brief in ECtHR, Gauer and others v. France No. 61521/08, 16 August 2011 < https://it.scribd.com/document/73416199/ECHR-Gauer-v-France-amicus-curiae-EGNHRI> accessed 6 December 2019 Fair Trials, ‘Effective Legal Assistance in Pre-Trial Detention Decision-Making’ <https:// www.fairtrials.org/sites/default/files/publication_pdf/Fair-Trials-EFPTD-regional-handbook.pdf> accessed 11 December 2019 Fair Trials, ‘Glass boxes in courtrooms violate presumption of innocence, finds French Ombudsperson’ (24 April 2018) <http://www.fairtrials.org/news/glass-boxes-courtrooms-violate-presumption-innocence-finds-french-ombudsperson> accessed 6 December 2019 • Fair Trials, ‘Roadmap Practitioners Tools: Interpretation and Translation’ <https://www. fairtrials.org/sites/default/files/publication_pdf/Access%20to%20Interpretation%20 and%20Translation%20Toolkit.pdf> accessed 5 December 2019 • Fair Trials, ‘Roadmap Practitioners Tools: Access to a Lawyer Directive’ <https://www.fairtrials.org/wp-content/uploads/A2L-Toolkit-FINAL.pdf> accessed 5 December 2019 • Fair Trials, ‘Roadmap Practitioner Tools: Right to Information Directive’, <https://www. fairtrials.org/sites/default/files/publication_pdf/Right%20to%20Information%20Toolkit%20.pdf> accessed 10 December 2019 • Fair Trials, ‘Written comments of Fair Trials to Beuze v Belgium App. No 7149/10 (Grand Chamber)’ <www.fairtrials.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/171020-Beuze-v-BelgiumIntervention.pdf> accessed 30 October 2018 • Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions and UNICEF, ‘Children´s Rights in National Human Rights Institutions: A Mapping Exercise’ (2018) <https://nhri.ohchr. org/EN/News/Documents/GANHRI%20UNICEF%20-%20Children%E2%80%99s%20 Rights%20in%20National%20Human%20Rights%20Institutions.pdf> accessed 30 October 2018 • GANHRI, ‘General Observations of the Sub-Committee on Accreditation’ (2018) • GANHRI, Subcommittee on Accreditation (SCA), Northern Ireland Report (May 2016) • Grzelak A, ‘Choosing between two Evils: the Polish Ombudsman’s Dilemma’ in Verfassungsblog (6 May 2018) <https://verfassungsblog.de/choosing-between-two-evils-thepolish-ombudsmans-dilemma> accessed 6 December 2019 • Hungarian Commissioner for Fundamental Rights, Annual Report of 2012 • Hungarian Commissioner for Fundamental Rights, Annual Report of 2017 115