and Italy a re-examination; in Sweden a review. 67. (bzfo)), Internationale Ärzte für die Verhütung des Atomkrieges, Ärzte in sozialer Verantwortung, (IPPNW; International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, German Section: Physicians in Social Responsibility), Refugio München (Counseling and Treatment Center for Refugees and Victims of Torture, Munich) & Jesuiten-Flüchtlingsdienst Deutschland (Jesuit Refugee Service Germany, (JRS). The shortfalls highlighted in the Parallel Report are referred to in more detail in Part 3 of this report. Care Full report. 2005. p.153-4. 68. Canada. Immigration and Refugee Board. Guideline on procedures with respect to vulnerable persons appearing before the IRB. 8.4. 69. The member centre in Australia further noted that this does not include a judicial review stage of national asylum proceedings (i.e. a challenge brought by a failed asylum seeker against the state in relation to a decision to refuse asylum on one or more public law grounds). 70. Australia. Migration Review Tribunal and Refugee Review Tribunal. Guidance on the Assessment of Credibility. 8.2, 8.4 and 8.5. 71. Ibid. paragraph 44. 72. Hungary. Cordelia Foundation confirmed that funding for MLRs is from the European Refugee Fund (ERF) and UNVFVT. The government matches the ERF’s contribution, so it indirectly contributes to funding the costs of MLRs. 73. Some of the additional information on costs of MLRs was provided by centres in Finland, Ireland, Moldova and Sweden in response to the ICAR Foundation survey: Medical certification on Torture. April 2012. 74. 75. 76. SBPM is a Working Group in Germany that has produced ‘Standards on the assessment of reactive mental trauma episodes’. See http://sbpm. de. See for example: Haenel F. and Wenk-Ansohn M. (Ed.). Begutachtung psychisch reaktiver Traumafolgen in aufenthaltsrechtlichen Verfahren. Weinheim: Beltz. 2004; Wenk-Ansohn M., ScheefMaier G., Gierlichs H.W. Zur Begutachtung psychisch reaktiver Traumafolgen in aufenthaltsrechtlichen verfahren – ein Update. In: Jr. Feldmann, G.H. Seidler (Ed.). Traum(a ) und Migration. Psychosozial Verlag. 2013: p.283. Human Rights Foundation of Turkey (TIHV) did not participate in the IRCT questionnaire. However, more information on the training it offers and its work with asylum-seekers and refugees is available at: http://www.tihv.org.tr/ (accessed on 20 May 2013). 77. Ireland. Criminal Justice (United Nations Convention against Torture) Act 2000. Available at: http://emn.ie/cat_search_detail. jsp?clog=4&itemID=36&item_name (accessed on 8 May 2013). 78. This additional information on referrals was provided by member centres in response to the ICAR Foundation survey, April 2012. 79. Amnesty International. Annual Report on France, 2012. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,COI,,,FRA,,4fbe393cc,0.html (last accessed on 23 September 2013). 80. The “airport procedure” was highlighted to the UN Committee against Torture in a Parallel Report, Complementing the 5th Periodic Report of the Federal German Government (CAT/C/DEU/5) in accordance with the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Submitted in 2011 by: Behandlungszentrum für Folteropfer (Berlin Center for the Treatment of Torture Victims 84 / Recognising victims of torture in national asylum procedures 81. For more information see: http://www.bamf.de/ EN/Migration/AsylFluechtlinge/Asylverfahren/ BesondereVerfahren/besondereverfahren-node. html and http://www.proasyl.de/en/topics/ basics/asylum-from-a-to-z/ (accessed on 21 May 2013). 82. iMMO indicated that there is an accelerated procedure in which VoTs can be processed. RvA NL indicated that there is no accelerated procedure. 83. UN Human Rights Committee. Concluding observations of the Netherlands. 25 August 2009. CCPR/C/NLD/CO/4. Paragraph 9. 84. Amnesty International. Amnesty International Annual Report 2012 – Netherlands. May 2012. Available at: http://www.refworld.org/ docid/4fbe3920c.html (accessed on 24 April 2013). 85. Canada. Citizenship and Immigration Canada website: http://www.cic.gc.ca/ (accessed on 21 May 2013). 86. The member centre in Baltimore — ASTT — confirmed that some asylum hearings are expedited, for example, if the applicant has a sound claim but did not meet the one-year deadline for filing the asylum application, they may be automatically sent for a court hearing. 87. Jesuit Refugee Service. Becoming Vulnerable in Detention (The DEVAS Project). June 2010. Available at: www.jrseurope.org (accessed on 21 May 2013). 88. Amnesty International. Annual Report 2012 - the Netherlands. May 2012. Available at: www.amnesty.org/en/region/netherlands/report-2012 (last accessed on 23 September 2013). 89. Amnesty International. Amnesty International Annual Report 2012 – Germany. May 2012. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/ docid/4fbe393a6e.html (accessed 21 May 2013). 90. The response from FAVL refers to Article 37 of the law on foreign citizens of the Republic of Armenia. Article 47 of the same law states: “In case Police temporary detains the asylum seeker, the Designated Body shall have unhindered access to the asylum seeker and his/her family members, in order to continue with the asylum procedure, as well as to facilitate the regularization of their residential status.” 91. Canada. Immigration and Refugee Board. Freqently Asked Questions - Immigration Division. Available at: http://www.irb-cisr.gc.ca/eng/FindRech/ Pages/faq.aspx#id (last accessed on 23 September 2013). 92. USA. Immigration and Nationality Act 1997, 235(b) (1)(B)(ii). Available at http://www.uscis.gov/ (accessed on 24 April 2013).