under the pre.ent rule. Hon-reoeipt ot .uoh oomment. within the e.tabli.hed time-limit .hould, a. a rule, not delay the oon.ideration of the admi •• ibility at the communication. 9. In the cour •• of the oon.id.ration at the qu•• tion at the admi •• ibility of a communication. the Committee or the Working Group may r.que.t the State party to take .tep. l~ avoid a po•• ibl. irreparable damag. to the p.r.on or p.r.on. who claim to be ,ictim(.) of the all.q.d violation. Such a requ•• t addr••••d to the State party do•• not imply that any d.oi.ion ha. been reach.d on the qu•• tion of the admi •• ibility at the communication. 1. Where the Committee d.cid•• that a communication i. inadmi •• ible under articl. 22 ot the Conv.ntion, or it. con.id.ration i • • u.pended or ~i.continued, the Committee .hall a • •oon a. po•• ibl. tran.mit it. deci.ion, through the Seoretary-Gen.ral, to the author at the communication and, wh.re the communication ha. Deen transmitt.d to a Stat. party cono.rned, to that State party. 2. If the Committee ha. deolar.d a communioation ina4mls.ible und.r article 22. paragraph 5, of the Conv.ntion, thi. d.ci.ion may b. review.d at a lat.r date by the Committee upon D written r.qu•• t by or on behalf at the individual oonc.l'ned. Such written requ•• t .hall oontain docum.ntary .vid.nc. to the .ff.ct that the rea.on. tor inadmi •• ibility r.ferred to in article 22, paraqraph 5, of the Convention no longer apply. C. Con.id.ration of CgmmuniCAtioD~th.il~ ~ lUtho.4.o!.4ealing with admll.ibl. cODIDunication. 1. When it ha. aecided that a communication i. admi •• ible under article 22 at the Convention, the Committee .hall transmit to the State party, through the Secretary-Gen.ral, the te.t of it. deci.ion tog.th.r with any .ubmi •• ion received tram the author of the communioation not already tran.mitted to the State party under rule 13/22, paragraph 2. The Committ.e .hall .,180 intorm the author of the communication. t.hrough the Secretary-General. of it. deci.ion. 2. Wlthin .ix month•• the State party concerned .hall submit to the Committee explanation. or .tatementa clarifying the caae under con.ideration and the ['emedy, i t any. that may have been taken by it. Th.. Committee may indicate. it i t deems it nece•• ary, the type of information it "i.he. to receive from the St.at.. party concerned. w~itlen 3. In the couue of it. conaideration, the Commi ttee may infor'm the State pftl'ly of its views on the desirability, because or III'geney, of t.aking lntedm meftSUrOfl t.o avoid po.sible irreparable damage to the peuwn or persons who clAim to be victim(.) oC the alleged violation. In doing 60, the Committee shall inforrn the State party concerfied that such expre.Lton ot itB view. on interim measure. doe6 not pl'ejudge ite final views on the merlte or the communication. -40,-