A hybrid model can encompass a number of different types of cooperation between public health care systems and NGOs. In one participating State, all NGOs had to be formally recognised as a third party service provider. As such, all NGOs were operating according to the same procedures, while still being able to provide individualised care for the victims. In another OSCE participating state, 50 % of the services were provided by three state authorised NGOs while the other 50 % of the services were provided by the public health care system. It was also observed that sometimes programmes for the rehabilitation of victims of human trafficking were somehow overlapping with programmes in support of torture victims. It was also mentioned that in the context of armed conflicts it was challenging for public authorities to provide rehabilitation services for victims of torture in occupied territories. Under such circumstances, working with NGOs was even more important and often the only option. Another question raised was whether to provide rehabilitation for victims of torture in the country of origin or in third countries. During the discussion it became clear that this question can only be answered on a case-by-case basis as it very much depends on the context. In order for rehabilitation to be effective, it needs to take place in a safe and secure environment. This is why many victims seek assistance in third countries. On the other hand, the support of family and local networks in the country of origin can also have a positive impact on the victim’s recovery. “Rehabilitation supports survivors of violence to rebuild their lives and livelihoods. For Denmark, rehabilitation services are positive investments benefiting the individual, his or her family as well as the wider community.” Carsten Staur, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Denmark to the United Nations in Geneva D. Working Group 4: Delivery of rehabilitation services to torture victims - monitoring and evaluation Background – ODIHR/CTI Practical Tool: The UN Committee against Torture, in its General Comment No. 3, establishes three criteria to be considered in the implementation of state rehabilitation services for torture victims: 1. Are rehabilitation services sufficiently available? Is information about victims’ rights and the existence of rehabilitation services available, including in languages of ethnic and religious minorities? Are a sufficient number of relevant professionals employed in rehabilitation services and do they cover all relevant geographical areas? 2. Are rehabilitation services accessible to all torture victims? Can they be accessed without discrimination, promptly and in a safe, secure and confidential environment? 16