1992, he was further sentenced to a three-year ban
from French territory. He filed an appeal against the
decision to ban him with the Paris Court of Major
Jurisdiction in October 1996, but no action was
taken.
1,000 kilometres covered in seven hours, he was
seated between two police officers, with his hands
cuffed behind his back, and he experienced very
considerable back pain because he suffers from
degenerative discopathy. The police officers are said
to have stopped at one point and ordered Mr. Arkauz
to get out of the vehicle. Since he was unable to
move, the police officers reportedly threw him to the
ground and beat him. He adds that the police officers
intimidated him throughout the journey and that the
treatment to which he was subjected is contrary to
article 16 of the Convention.
2.4 On 15 November 1996, the Ministry of the
Interior commenced a proceeding for the author’s
deportation from French territory. A deportation
order can be enforced by the administration ex
officio and means that the person concerned is
automatically taken to the border. The author applied
to the Administrative Court of Limoges on 13
December 1996 requesting the annulment of the
deportation order which might be made out against
him and a stay of execution of such an order if it
were to be issued. However, his application for a
stay of execution was rejected by a ruling of 15
January 1997, the court having taken the view that
handing over the author would not be likely to have
irreversible consequences for him. An appeal from
this ruling was not possible because the deportation
measure had already been implemented.
2.9 As soon as he had been handed over to the
Spanish Civil Guard he was placed in
incommunicado detention. A forensic physician is
said to have examined him and pronounced him fit
to travel on to Madrid under certain conditions, since
his health had been very much affected by the
hunger strike. He states that he was slapped on the
ears and about the head during the journey of about
500 kilometres to Madrid. He also claims to have
been constantly told that he would later be tortured
and killed. On entering Madrid, the officials are said
to have thrust his head between his knees so that he
would not know where he was being taken, namely
to the Civil Guard Headquarters in Madrid. He says
that he fainted from exhaustion. When revived, he
was reportedly subjected to long interrogation
sessions. He was allegedly forced to remain seated,
with his legs apart, in a position that caused him very
considerable back pain. With his eyes covered, he
was reportedly slapped all over his body. He was
also allegedly subjected to loud hand claps and
whistling close to his ears and told in detail about the
methods and long sessions of torture that would be
inflicted on him. At one point, the guards are said to
have ripped his clothes off, while continuing to beat
him. Later, with some guards holding his legs and
others his arms, he was allegedly subjected to “la
bolsa”1 and at the same time beaten on the testicles.
He reportedly then lost consciousness. When revived
and still masked, he was reportedly again seated on a
chair, with his legs spread apart and his arms held to
his legs. The guards allegedly brought electrodes
close to him. As he tried to move away, he
reportedly received a direct shock.
2.5 On 10 December 1996, the author began a
hunger strike to protest against his deportation. Later,
because of his deteriorating health, the author was
transferred to the local prison at Fresnes, in the Paris
region, where he again went on strike, refusing to
take liquids.
2.6 On 17 December 1996, the author was
informed that the Deportation Board of the Indre
Prefecture had rendered an opinion in favour of his
deportation, considering that his presence in French
territory constituted a serious threat to public order.
The Board did, however, remind the Ministry of the
Interior of the law stipulating that an alien could not
be removed to another country where his life or
liberty might be threatened or where he could be
exposed to treatment contrary to article 3 of the
European Convention on Human Rights. Following
this opinion, a ministerial deportation order was
issued on 13 January 1997 and communicated that
day to the author. He was at the same time notified
of a decision indicating that the order of deportation
to Spain was being put into effect. The deportation
measure was implemented the same day, after a
medical examination had concluded that Mr. Arkauz
could be transported by car to the Spanish border.
2.10 Some officials reportedly tried to persuade
him to cooperate with them, using emotional
arguments concerning his wife and two children, but
the author says that he refused to cooperate. He was
reportedly then examined by a doctor. After the
doctor left, he was reportedly masked again and
beaten about the ears and the head. Another
examination was made by a doctor, who reportedly
stated that the author was close to suffering from
2.7 By a letter of 17 March 1997, the author
informed the Committee that his deportation to
Spain had taken place on 13 January 1997. He
reported having been ill-treated and threatened by
the French police and described the incidents which
occurred in Spain after his deportation.
2.8 The
during the
weakness.
Fresnes to
author claims to have suffered greatly
journey to Spain because of his extreme
He states that while being driven from
the Spanish border, a distance of nearly
1
This form of torture consists in covering the head with a
plastic bag to cause asphyxia.
44
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents