conditions, individual services and detention itself. On the basis of the NPM recommendation upon its
previous visit, Dutovlje social care institution supplemented the form intended for consent to admission
in a secure ward, which is an example of good communication: “I am aware that consent may be revoked
at any time and I may demand to be dismissed from the secure ward.” Such supplementation of the
form was commended, but we also added that the institution must observe the fact that consent may
be revoked in any form (written, verbal, conclusive actions). In the case of reasons for an individual’s
complaint, it is mandatory for all options to be available to individuals to submit complaints (also
anonymously if necessary) and that such complaints be discussed promptly. We thus commended
information received from Dutovlje social care institution that the collection box for complaints
installed in the secure ward is emptied at least once a week.
4.4 Visits to psychiatric hospitals
In 2016, we visited five psychiatric hospitals, i.e. two were regular visits (Ljubljana University Psychiatric
Hospital and Idrija Psychiatric Hospital), one was a control visit (Maribor University Medical Centre,
Department of Psychiatry, Unit for Forensic Psychiatry), whereby we paid particular attention to the
observance of recommendations made on the previous regular visit to the relevant institution, and two
were thematic visits (the latter are discussed in a separate chapter), whereby we examined the type and
amount of activities available to residents or patients at the weekend (Vojnik and Begunje psychiatric
hospitals). During all visits, we checked the observance of recommendations made by the NPM on its
last visit and other circumstances important for a final assessment of cases of possible ill-treatment,
punishment or even torture in the relevant institutions.
The visits were carried out during regular control which is planned in advance; all visits were unannounced.
The visits took place according to an established order; we were divided into two groups, with part of
the control group conducting an interview with the management of the institution, and the other
part of the group, usually NGO representatives, inspecting ward, where they examined all rooms in
the ward, spoke to staff and patients, and monitored life on the ward for a while, i.e. particularly the
treatment of patients and staff conduct.
During the concluding discussion, we informed the management of our findings and made our initial
recommendations. Following each visit, the group prepared a report with findings and recommendations.
One part of the report comprises the opinion of the expert from the psychiatric field, who visited the
relevant institution at a later time, and provided their opinion based on their findings regarding medical
and health care.
Following the response of the institution to the preliminary report, we drafted a final report which
was submitted to the relevant institution, the Ministry of Health and the Psychiatric expert council
of Republic Slovenia at the above Ministry. The reports on individual visits are available on the
Ombudsman’s website.
The reports on visits were thus drafted on the basis of inspecting secure wards, discussions with the
management of the relevant institutions, discussions with randomly selected residents, and on the
basis of reviewing documentation of randomly selected cases.
The institutions regularly responded to our recommendations and, in most cases, agreed with our
findings or recommendations and assured us that some deficiencies had already been eliminated or
that improvements were planned.
During the visits, 66 recommendations were made, half of which were realised immediately, while
most of the remaining recommendations were accepted, but not yet realised. Seven or eleven per
cent of recommendations were rejected.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE NPM IN 2016
NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM UNDER THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE UN CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT
71
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents