With regard to the petitioner’s criticism that the Riigikogu Social Affairs Committee did not involve the petitioner in the processing of the Draft Act, the Chancellor found that the petitioner as the natural person had been able to present her views to the Riigikogu Social Affairs Committee and she had been heard at the meeting of the Committee. In conclusion, the Chancellor drew the attention of the petitioner to the fact that this a new Act which has not yet entered into force and it is not ruled out that not all the legal provisions in it will begin to function in a manner and way as intended by the legislator. Therefore, it is possible that in the future some problems in practice may arise which may also lead to unconstitutionality. 57