CAT/C/59/D/581/2014 sufficient evidence to enable it to conclude that his forcible removal to his country of origin would expose him to a foreseeable, real and personal risk of torture within the meaning of article 3 of the Convention. 8. The Committee, acting under article 22 (7) of the Convention, therefore concludes that the complainant’s expulsion to India would not constitute a violation of article 3 of the Convention. 8