3. International human rights law has laid down detailed criteria about when it is lawful to detain people and how such people should be treated in detention. 400 A. Deprivation of the Right to Liberty What amounts to deprivation 4. Every individual has a right to respect for their liberty and security of the person.401 States are under an obligation to protect against arbitrary deprivations of liberty.402 5. Deprivation of liberty is more than a mere interference with the freedom of movement.403 Examples of deprivations of liberty include:         Control orders including curfews of up to 16 hours;404 Involuntary hospitalization;405 Confinement to a restricted area of an airport;406 Abduction and involuntary transportation from one country to another;407 House arrest;408 Military detention;409 Detention for drug addiction and vagrancy;410 Detention of children for educational purposes. 400 See also UN Body of Principles for the Protection of all Persons under Any form of Detention or Imprisonment, 1988; UN Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty; Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (1957); the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment (1988); UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (Beijing Rules); Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials (1978); Principles of Medical Ethics relevant to the Role of Health Personnel, particularly Physicians, in the Protection of Prisoners and Detainees against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1982); Guidelines on the Applicable Criteria and Standards relating to the Detention of Asylum Seekers and Alternatives to Detention; European Prison Rules, 2006. 401 Article 9 ICCPR; Article 14 Arab Charter; Article 6 ACHPR; Article 7 ACHR; Article 5 ECHR. 402 Human Rights Committee, Communication 195/1985, W. Delgado Páez v Colombia, 12 July 1990. 403 Human Rights Committee, Communication 263/1987, González del Río v. Peru, 18 July 1988, para. 5.1; Communication No. 833/1998, Karker v. France, 30 Oct 2000, para. 8.5; Communication 456/1991, Celepli v. Sweden, 18 July 1994, para. 6.1. 404 Human Rights Committee, Concluding observations, United Kingdom, CCPR/C/GBR/CO/6 (2008), para. 17. 405 Human Rights Committee, Communication 754/1997, A. v. New Zealand, 3 August 1999, para. 7.2; CAT, Concluding observations Moldova CAT/C/MDA/CO/2 (2010), para. 13. 406 Human Rights Committee, Concluding observations Belgium CCPR/CO/81/BEL (2004), para. 17. 407 Communication 52/1979, Lopez v. Uruguay, 29 July 1981. 408 Communication 1460/2006, Yklymova v. Turkmenistan, 20 July, 2009, para. 7.2-7.4; Communication 1172/2003, Madani v. Algeria, 28 March 2007, para. 8.5. 409 Communication 962/2001, Human Rights Committee, Mulezi v. Democratic Republic of the Congo, 8 July 2004, para. 5.2. Communication No. 265/1987, Vuolanne v. Finland, 7 April 1989, para. 9.4. 410 Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations Rwanda, CCPR/C/RWA/CO/3 (2009), para. 16. 83