theme for 2017: supervision of those deprived of their liberty
58
Supervision of those
deprived of their liberty
Supervision of individuals deprived of their liberty is handled in different
ways by the authorities. In the police’s custody facility, people arrested and
held are supervised once an hour as a general rule. In the case of people taken
into custody due to intoxication, supervision occurs every 15 minutes, as a
general rule. The supervision aims to safeguard persons from dying as a result
of intoxication or illness. As a general rule, there is no regular supervision of
persons admitted to the Prison and Probation Service’s remand prisons. The
contact the staff have with detainees regularly during the day, for example, in
connection with serving food and spending time outdoors, is regarded as part
of the basis for assessing how well detainees feel. In all activities where there
are individuals deprived of their liberty, procedures are applied for detecting
if there is a risk of a detainee being involved in self harm. If there is a suspicion of such a risk, a decision is taken to supervise the detainee at special
intervals or constant. The decision that a detainee is to be placed under supervision is therefore of great significance for the individual’s safety. A decision
on supervision and the supervision performed must also be put on record, in
the correct manner.
Police custody facilities
The inspections during 2015–2017
show that there has been a
tangible improvement in this area.
During several of the inspections,
it was noted that previous opinions voiced by the Parliamentary
Ombudsmen have been responded to and that the majority of the
police custody facilities nowadays
have procedures for regular supervision of the detainees.
Even from the outset of the Parliamentary Ombudsmen’s OPCAT unit, supervision of those deprived of their liberty in police custody facilities has been a
priority matter. During 2011–2014, deficiencies were noted in that there were
no procedures for regular supervision. It was noted that there are relatively
frequent deficiencies in how supervision is put on record. The Parliamentary
Ombudsmen has previously emphasised that it is important that detailed
notes of the detainee’s status be kept, in connection with supervision. It is not
sufficient to state in a routine fashion on each occasion of supervision that the
detainee is, for example, “lying down”.
The inspections during 2015–2017 show that there has been a tangible improvement in this area. During several of the inspections, it was noted that previous opinions expressed by the Parliamentary Ombudsmen have been taken
into account and that the majority of the police custody facilities nowadays
have procedures for regular supervision of the inmates. In 2016, an inspection
was carried out at a newly-opened police custody facility. In connection with
the inspection, it was established that the police custody facility – unlike the
majority of the other police custody facilities in the country – had no procedures for regular supervision. During an unannounced follow-up inspection
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents