3.3 T
he human rights position and case law regarding the
placement of prisoners in solitary confinement
The potentially harmful effects of solitary confinement are recognised by human rights bodies, who
view it as an undesirable prison practice which can only be justified in extreme cases42, must only
be used for the shortest time possible43, and which, in certain circumstances, may be in violation of
international law.
The Human Rights Committee has expressed the view that
“solitary confinement is a harsh penalty with serious psychological consequences and is justifiable only
in case of urgent need; the use of solitary confinement other than in exceptional circumstances and for
limited periods is inconsistent with article 10, paragraph 1, of the Covenant”44 and may amount to acts
prohibited by Article 7 (torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment)45.
The UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) has been critical of practices involving prolonged solitary
confinement and has stated that these may amount to treatment in violation of the prohibition
against torture or inhuman treatment. For example, the CAT has expressed grave concerns
regarding the strict and prolonged solitary confinement in supermax prisons in the United States
(CAT, 2000); lack of time limits on placement in solitary confinement and the number of detainees
isolated for more than ten years in Japan (CAT, 2007); and, the isolation of pre-trial detainees in
Denmark and Norway (CAT, 2002).
A joint report issued by UN Rapporteurs on the situation of detainees held by US forces at
Guantanamo Bay stated that “the general conditions of detention, in particular the uncertainty
about the length of detention and prolonged solitary confinement, amount to inhuman treatment and
to a violation of the right to health as well as a violation of the right of detainees under article 10 (1)
of ICCPR to be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person”
(Report to the UN Commission on Human Rights, 62 Session, 15/2/06, UN DOC E/CN.4/2006/120).
The European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) has taken the view that solitary
confinement, for whichever reason, requires particular attention. In assessing any one case,
“the principle of proportionality requires that a balance be struck between the requirements of the case
and the application of a solitary confinement-type regime, which is a step that can have very harmful
consequences for the person concerned”46.
Sourcebook on solitary confinement: The decision to place prisoners and detainees in solitary confinement
33
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents