29 1. THE ACTIVITIES AND ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND HIS DEPUTIES IN 2019 Type of recommendation / Year of receipt 2014 2018 2019 total 1 73 74 186 186 3 5 Proposal for the elaboration of a government decree 1 1 Proposal for the amendment of a government decree 7 7 Proposal for the creation of regulatory means for a public law organisation 2 2 Recommendation for a supervisory organ Recommendation for the organ under review Initiating the remedy of a constitutional impropriety at the organ concerned 2 Proposal for the elaboration of a ministerial decree Proposal for the amendment of a ministerial decree 2 Proposal for the amendment of a decree issued by the head of an independent regulatory agency Proposal for the amendment of a municipality decree 9 9 15 17 1 1 4 4 Proposal for the amendment of an act 1 18 19 Initiating the correct future interpretation and application of the law 1 20 21 Not specified Grand total 6 1 12 12 351 358 Recommendations closed according to types Filing period: 1/1/2012 – 31/12/2019 / Completion period: 1/1/2019 – 31/12/2019 Type of recommendation / Addressee’s response / Year of receipt Recommendation for the supervisory organ 2014 2019 total 5 5 50 51 the recommendation was not accepted by the addressee by the deadline, or no substantive response was given 4 4 the recommendation was accepted by the addressee with delay (e.g. no response was given, but the recommendation was implemented) 1 1 the recommendation was partly accepted/partly implemented by the addressee 12 12 not specified 1 1 the deadline for response has not yet expired (e.g. the deadline of the initiative submitted to the superior organ has not expired) the recommendation was accepted by the addressee by the deadline 1 total Recommendation for the organ under review 73 74 the deadline for the response has not yet expired (e.g. the deadline of the initiative submitted to the superior organ has not expired) 1 10 10 the recommendation was accepted by the addressee by the deadline 140 140 the recommendation was not accepted by the addressee by the deadline, or no substantive response was given 7 7 the recommendation was accepted by the addressee with delay (e.g. no response was given, but the recommendation was implemented) 7 7 the recommendation was not accepted by the addressee by the delayed deadline, or no substantive response was given 2 2 the recommendation was partly accepted/partly implemented by the addressee 16 16 despite receiving multiple warnings, the addressee of the first recommendation did not respond, and did not implement the recommendation 1 1 not specified 3 3 186 186 3 4 total Initiating the remedy of a constitutional impropriety at the organ concerned 2018 the recommendation was accepted by the addressee by the deadline 1 the recommendation was not accepted by the addressee by the deadline, or no substantive response was given 1 total 2 1 3 5