40 THE GREEK OMBUDSMAN for recreation or other activities. This was assessed as especially cumbersome and its direct consequences on minors having to remain in complete inactivity for hours were apparent. The spaces had no equipment other than the built-in beds (and the beds in the women cell). At the entry, detainees were given no other bed linen but blankets, which –according to the harbourmaster’s assurance, were cleaned at a dry cleaner after detention was terminated for each person (unlike police cells, for which the official statement was that blankets are not washed) Meals were provided by contracting local professionals, who alternated. Adult detainees complained of insufficiency and poor quality of food. This allegation was not confirmed by the Ombudsman’s team, judging from the appearance of the food distributed at the time of inspection. No problems were reported concerning medical treatment. The detainees stated having difficulties with communication. It was also obvious that they were not informed of procedures and the timing thereof, which deteriorated their frustration. In any case, at the time of inspection, a UNCHR employee, accompanied by an interpreter, was present, being briefed and providing information. In conclusion: • Detention conditions were far from suitable, even for a few days detention. There were shortages and deficiencies on many levels, especially concerning the premises. Lack of cleaning service, problematic buildings with insufficient natural light, lack of access to yard time, as well as the complete unavailability of personal hygiene access (showering) are deemed especially problematic, given that detention de facto lasts for several days. • Specific recommendations were made even at the time of the on-site inspection, concerning immediately feasible (and inexpensive) improvements. It was observed that lack of natural light in one of the cells was due to the air conditioning unit’s pipeline and it was suggested that it is moved. • Furthermore, it was considered that creation of yard space at the exit of the adult men detention space, similar to the minors’ space, was feasible and in any case necessary. It is noted that there was no objective obstacle of creating such a space, even if a makeshift one (for instance, by putting a fence around the corridor’s exit), as the detention cells comprise of autonomous buildings on an open outdoor field. The Ombudsman’s team also noted that any escape risk could be avoided, by providing yard time on rotation, considering the relatively few detainees. • Further recommendations by the Ombudsman include the self-evident need for regular and systematic cleaning of detention spaces by a