MONITORING METHODOLOGY D. DRAFTING RECOMMENDATIONS Within the reporting process, the task of drafting the recommendations for improvements is highly important and should be dedicated the required attention and precautions. The formulation of the recommendations is determinant as regards to the way in which they will be effectively and successfully implemented. They shall be clear, specific, supported by documented information and based on an in-depth analysis. Except for important cases of violation of children’s rights such as torture, illtreatment or worse, they shall be written in a way that the improvement suggested is practically achievable and is perceived not as a condemnation for not being in conformity with the concerned standards but as a challenging opportunity to enhance practice and, in doing so, to better respect children’s rights deprived of their liberty. As recommendations may have resource implications, identifying that more financial and/or material, human resources would be required to implement the recommendation effectively, would be an asset. Recommendations shall be SMART: Specific: One recommendation regarding one specific issue; each recommendation should suggest one specific solution and not only represent a vague wish; Measurable: Follow up visits or further monitoring visits shall be able to assess the degree of implementation of a former recommendation. Achievable: Recommendations should be applicable in practice on the premises that States shall provide sufficient resources to do so. Realistic: Proposed actions should lead to realistic results. Time-related: Recommendation should specify a timeframe for completion (shortmedium-long term). In addition to their formulation, recommendations shall be addressed to the targeted recipients and at the proper level of authority. In other words, recommendations should be aimed at the level of authority that has the power to make the appropriate change or decision for improvement. 87 4