- 154 petitioner in 1997 and 1998. On 15 January 1999, the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration’s
delegate issued an opinion pursuant to sections 70 (5) and 53 (1) of the Immigration Act that the
petitioner constitutes a danger to the public in Canada due to the number and nature of criminal
convictions acquired by the applicant in Canada since 1992. A deportation order was issued
against the petitioner on 1 March 1999.
2.3
On 15 April 1999, the petitioner filed an application for leave and judicial review of the
decision to remove him to Iran. The Federal Court dismissed the application on 12 July 2000.
The Federal Court had denied his application for leave and for judicial review of the decision
that he constituted a danger to the public on 14 July 1999. Counsel submits that all effective
domestic remedies have been exhausted and that the petitioner expects his deportation any time.
2.4
The petitioner alleges that he fled persecution in Iran in July 1990. He submits that, in
early 1985, while in high school, he had been arrested and questioned by Revolutionary Guards
about his participation in political discussions. The Petitioner was held for eight days during
which he was beaten, punched, kicked, and tortured. In September 1984, the petitioner’s family
home was raided by Revolutionary Guards after siblings left Iran because of perceived
involvement with the pro-monarchist movement. The petitioner alleges that he was held for 18
days and that his sister, his mother, and he himself were beaten. In January 1985, while serving
in the military, the petitioner was suspected of political activity and detained and questioned by
an officer of the Ideological/Religious Department of the Army for two days. The petitioner
submits that he was forced to witness the execution of six soldiers convicted of opposing the
regime and its war efforts. In April 1985, the petitioner was wounded by a grenade and released
from the army, after treatment in a military hospital, in February 1986. In October 1989, the
petitioner was arrested by Revolutionary Guards, handcuffed and taken to the offices of the
branch of police that deals with anti-revolutionary offences (Komiteh), where he was allegedly
beaten and held for one month. In March and April 1990, the Komiteh again detained the
petitioner for 24 hours each time. After the second arrest, the petitioner was ordered to report
daily to the Komiteh office. The petitioner submits that every time he reported to the office, he
was afraid that the police officers would kill or torture him. After four or five days, the
petitioner fled to Bandar Abbas, obtained a false passport and fled Iran by plane. In 1993 a
summons was published in the Iranian newspaper Khabar indicating that the petitioner had been
charged with escape and was requested to report to the Investigation Branch of the General
Prosecutor’s Office in Shiraz.
2.5
The petitioner submits that he fears for his life and safety if he is returned to Iran.
Furthermore, the Iranian authorities would be alerted to his return, because the petitioner would
require travel documents issued by Iran. The petitioner alleges that the State party did not assess
the risks he faced upon his return. The petitioner alleges also that he has never been assessed for
determining the likelihood that he will commit more crimes.
The complaint
3.
The petitioner claims that his forced return to Iran would violate articles 3 and 16 of the
Convention against Torture and Other Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. He
argues that there are substantive grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being
subjected to torture when deported, because he had been tortured before he left Iran and because
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents