Anti-Discrimination
only for Austrians and the denial of access to a restaurant to men with a
foreign appearance and similar discriminating practices were not sufficiently
prosecuted and punished by the authorities (Annual Report 2012, p. 74).
Previously, the Legal and Constitutional Service of the Federal Chancellery
had already reacted to the first recommendation of the AOB, stating in a
circular letter to all government agencies that racial discrimination was not
a petty offence, but that such offences had to be prosecuted and punished
with all available means. The objective of the present amendment of the law
was to achieve an improvement of the protection against discrimination of
ethnic minorities in their access to public goods and services in accordance
with the recommendations of the AOB and international bodies for the
protection of human rights, such as the European Commission against
Racism and Intolerance (ECRI). In order to discriminate against the person
affected due to his or her ethnic origin, it is not required to have a particular
intention, nor need the sole motive of the offender be to discriminate. This
was intended to deprive any subsequent defensive allegations of their basis.
In order to examine if this amendment of the law actually effected an
improvement of the protection from discrimination, the AOB is currently
undertaking an ex-officio investigative proceeding, in which all the Laender
are requested to provide information on the number and result of all
proceedings carried out since the new provision entered into force. The AOB
would like to thank the Laender for their responses to the comprehensive
questions and for transmitting the files.
Follow-up
investigation to identify
improvement
At the same time, the AOB is examining the enforcement of similar provisions
of the Austrian Federal Equal Opportunities Act, which specifically make
discriminating job and residential advertisements punishable under the
law. In this area, the Ombud for Equal Treatment has the right under the
law to petition for the initiation of administrative criminal proceedings to
participate in these proceedings as a so-called legal party and to file appeals
against official decisions and penal orders. In this regard, the AOB receives
information from the Ombud for Equal Treatment about suspected deficits in
the enforcement of these provisions by the competent authorities. At the time
of the editorial deadline of this report, the investigation was still ongoing.
Nevertheless, preliminary findings can already be reported.
Investigating
enforcement of
Austrian Federal Equal
Opportunities Act
The fact is that the provision under trade and industrial law, according
to which merchants and vendors can have their trade/business licence
revoked in the case of serious violations, has never been applied. A reason
for this could be that the authorities do not have sufficient information
about repeated violations against the prohibition of discrimination by a
merchant or vendor. After all, warnings or penalties for violation of the
prohibition against discrimination previously imposed on the same person
can be determined by the authorities only if they were imposed in the same
administrative district. In order to be able to find out if penalties were imposed
Repeated violations of
the prohibition against
discrimination
47
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents