substance‑misuse diagnoses) has been found in 37% of sentenced male
prisoners, 63% of men on remand, 57% of sentenced women and 76% of
women on remand. Multiple diagnoses are common, especially among
remand prisoners: approximately a quarter of men and a third of women
on remand received two or more diagnoses.3
It is clear that the burden of serious, yet treatable mental disorders in prison
is substantial. Given the limited resources of the prison system, it is doubtful
whether all those in need receive the appropriate care as envisaged by the ECHR.
2.1 Mental health services in prisons
The high incidence of mental disorders in a prison setting increases the
responsibility of the prison health‑care system. To start with, there should
be a doctor qualifed in psychiatry afliated to the health‑care service of
each prison, and some of the nurses employed there should have training in
this feld. The number of medical and nursing staf and the layout of prisons
should be such as to enable regular pharmacological, psychotherapeutic and
occupational therapy programmes to be carried out.4
Measures in relation to mental health
disorders in a prison setting
Not treating psychiatric illnesses in a prison setting may easily constitute
inhuman and degrading treatment,5 so ad hoc measures are needed. Those
responsible should consider the following measures for prisoners with psy‑
chiatric disorders:
X motivating and training medical staf and psychologists working in prison
to diagnose such cases and to participate actively in their management,
X providing specialist care in prison for such cases by assigning a psychiatrist
to arrange regular consultations,
X ensuring the availability of adequate supplies of psychotropic drugs,
X ensuring that, when necessary, longer‑term hospital care with an active
psychosocial component is possible,
3. Gunn J., Maden A. and Swinton M: Mentally disordered prisoners. London: Home Ofce
(1991); Maden A., Taylor C. J. A., Brooke D. et al: Mental disorder in remand prisoners. London:
Home Ofce (1995).
4. Slawomir Musial v. Poland 28300/06, Aerts v. Belgium 25357/94.
5. CPT/Inf (2005)18; Slawomir Musial v. Poland 28300/06, Aerts v. Belgium 25357/94.
Prison health care and medical ethics Page 30
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents