Implementation of recommendations in 2017 and 2018
64.9%
60.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
24.6%
15.4%
9.5%
Implementation of recommendations in
2017
Implemented
Partially implemented
10.8%
14.9%
Implementation of recommendations in
2018
Not implemented
Could not be evaluated
Communication with stakeholders
It is impossible to monitor situation in the penitentiary establishments and develop recommendations,
advocate and monitor their implementation without a dialogue with the civil society, international
organizations, relevant state institutions and other stakeholders. Accordingly, the National Preventive
Mechanism of Georgia carried out a number of important activities in this direction in 2019.
Dialogue with state bodies
In accordance with Article 22 of the Optional Protocol, "The competent authorities shall examine the
recommendations of the National Preventive Mechanism and enter into a dialogue with it on possible
implementation measures."
In order to meet the commitments under the Optional Protocol, the following is important:
First - The willingness of state agencies to enter into a constructive dialogue and hold meetings
on measures planned or taken for the implementation of recommendations. Inter alia, the
National Preventive Mechanism should be given the opportunity to submit observations and
recommendations on draft laws and other documents;
Second – Timely provision of data requested by the National Preventive Mechanism;
Third - Transparency of the system and proactive provision of information to the public about
the situation of prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment.
11