such notice, the patient is deprived from the possibility of appealing the decided measure/established decision, considering, for the court, the provisions of art. 62 par. (8) of Law no. 487/2002, republished: The decision of the court may be challenged with an appeal, within 3 days from being given, for those attending, or from its notice, for those who were absent. • a patient was admitted who, even though the Commission for the review of the involuntary admission procedure established that the requirements for maintaining involuntary admission were no longer met (on August 8, 2016) and the management of the hospital notified the Judge’s Office of Pitesti in due time (on August 9, 2016) remained involuntarily admitted for an extremely long time (3.5 months), pursuant to the decision of the court of November 7, 2016 (the first session was set for October 20, 2016 – recommended date), and the decision was notified to the hospital on November 15, 2016. The management of the hospital repeatedly asked to change the term, i.e. to schedule for a later date than the one set by the court, including a petition to the Bureau of Information and Public Relations of the Judge’s Office of Pitesti, asking that the request should be judged with emergency, based on legal provisions. However, the documents enclosed to the patient’s records showed that the court did not classify the termination of involuntary admission as an urgent case. In this situation, since the involuntary admission procedure stipulated that the patient will only be released once the court confirms the termination of involuntary admission by means of a judgment, the concerned patient was deprived from freedom for more than 90 days. The commission met on a monthly basis during this time and maintained its prevoius decision, i.e. terminated the conditions that imposed involuntary admission. Regarding the mentioned aspects and considering the provisions of art. 65 par. (4) corroborated with the provisions of art. 62 par. (1) of Law no. 487/2002, republished: the application regarding the confirmation of the termination of involuntary admission shall be judged with an emergency status, in the council room, based on art. 4 of Law no. 35/1997, republished, the NPM team notified the Superior Council of Magistrates. 111