Urlați, Prahova county; C.R.R.N. Plătărești, Călărași county; C.R.R.N. Războieni, Neamț county; C.I.T.O.P.A.H. Urlați, Prahova county).●in C.R.R.N. Plătărești, Călărași county, documents for 10 beneficiaries were sent to the legal department of D.G.A.S.P.C. Calarasi for indictment purposes, and for the other 30, solutions were being sought to identify guardians and to establish indictment. The issue of how to ensure their protection was raised, since the actions were just being taken for some of them and had not even been initiated for the others.● in C.I.T.O.P.A.H. Urlați, Prahova county it was found that only 9 beneficiaries had been indicted, and a legal representative had been appointed so that, considering the beneficiaries’ medical diagnosis, the issue of their legal protection was being raised, since the management of the centre had not taken actions with the Legal Service of D.G.A.S.P.C. Prahova, so as to appoint legal representatives, if required. ● in the case of C.R.R.N. Războieni,Neamț county, 31 indicted beneficiaries had no guardianship or curatorship established so that, even though they could not exercise their rights, they were not represented by anyone when decisions concerning them were being taken. The information and documents provided by the staff of the institution showed that actions had been taken to this purpose and discussions were initiated with the relatives of beneficiaries or actions with courts of law. Most cases pending with the courts were suspended, since no persons were identified to be appointed as guardians for indicted persons. Regarding this situation, visit team members found that, with a view to ensuring fundamental rights and the required guarantees for avoiding abuse on beneficiaries, filing complaints, access to justice, freedom of movement, private life, etc., actions must be pursued to establish protection measures, where applicable, since art. 111 N.C.C. stipulates the Centres’ obligation to notify the guardianship court ● in C.I.A.P.A.H. Urlați, Prahova some persons were not indicted, had no legal representative, but had serious cognitive impairment (e.g. oligophrenia) and were unable to sign the contract with the centre, so that legal representation was absolutely required. Recommendation: to initiate or pursue the required actions in order to take legal action to ensure the beneficiaries’ legal protection. Answer: the representatives of the Centre said that they had discussed with the lawyer of the institution, who is under a legal services agreement with the Centre, so as to submit files for indictment 123