● the absence of a special area for the activities of the social worker (Certificate of school and professional counselling issue). The People’s Advocate recommended to arrange a space dedicated to the activities of the social worker, since the activity of the social worker was undertaken in the same office as the head of the Centre, and the beneficiaries’ files were stored in the same office. The visited unit informed that an area had been identified for the proper performance of these activities; ● the social worker was not registered with the College of Romanian Social Workers and the relevant legal provisions were not met (the Residential Centre for Children with Severe Disabilities, the Community Services Complex of Oltenita, Calarasi county). The People’s Advocate recommended that s/he should register with the College of Romanian Social Workers, and the visited unit answered that the employed social worker was informed on this obligation; ● no Specific Intervention Programmes SIP were drawn up; SIPs were not drawn up properly, and the objectives were not individualized; their content was not known (the Behavioural Rehabilitation Centre for Boys – the “Floare de Colt” Complex of Social Services, Targoviste, Dambovita county; the Alexandra-Violeta Family Centre, Teleorman county; the “Casa Sperantei” Association of Campina, Prahova county); the awareness of each beneficiary, depending on his/her degree of maturity, was not ensured regarding the Individual Protection Plan - IPP and the Specific Intervention Programmes or these documents failed to include all information. The People’s Advocate recommended that Specific Intervention Programmes (SIP) should be drawn up for all children under a special protection measure; the awareness of each beneficiary, depending on his/her degree of maturity, had to be ensured regarding the Individual Protection Plan and the Specific Intervention Programmes; Individual Protection Plans had to be supplemented with detailed information regarding children who were studying abroad, based on regular reporting and communication. The visited units informed that the mentioned specific documents had been drawn up, according to the minimum quality standards, for each individual beneficiary.● no activities adapted to the beneficiaries’ needs were performed (the Behavioural Rehabilitation Centre for Boys – the “Floare de Colt” Complex of Social Services, Targoviste, Dambovita county). The People’s Advocate recommended to adapt the activities of the Centre to the 162