“Casa Noastra” Placement Centre of Zagujeni, Caras-Severin county). The People’s Advocate recommended to take all suitable administrative, social and educational actions in order to protect children against any forms of physical or psychological violence, injury or abuse, abandon or negligence, ill treatment or exploitation, including sexual abuse, sexual violence, to prevent situations when children are enticed or constrained to perform illegal sexual activities and be exploited for prostitution or other illegal sexual practices while they are in the custody of their legal representatives. The visited unit answered that police representatives had been and will still be invited for actions regarding the prevention of drug use, physical exploitation and prostitution. The beneficiaries will be included in a group-level prevention programme with the psychologist of the Centre on the topic of drug use, prostitution and exploitation; ● the absence of the register with records of the psychologist’s professional acts (the “Micul Rotterdam” Placement Centre of Constanta).The People’s Advocate recommended that the psychology practice should draw up a register with records of the psychologist’s professional acts, since they were not registered in a practice register as of the date of the visit. The representatives of the visited unit informed that a register was drawn up where the documents drawn up along these lines were recorded; ● no psychological support and counselling was provided to children who had been intimidated or discriminated (the “Casa Noastra” Placement Centre of Zagujeni, Caras-Severin county). The People’s Advocate recommended to observe legal provisions on supplying psychological support and counselling to children who were intimidated or discriminated , as well as access to services set out by the specialized child protection public service, also when children are separated. The visited unit answered that the purpose was to meet the children’s needs and the required actions were taken to follow the psychologist’s recommendations. ►Regarding the enforcement of measures to restrict the capacity of movement Based on the review of documents provided by the Centre’s representatives, the beneficiaries’ and the staff’s statements, it was found that containment was not enforced in the visited centres and no specific means and medical recommendations 167