Communication No. 263/1987 Submitted by: Miguel Gonzalez del Río Date of communication: 19 October 1987 Alleged victim: The author State party: Peru Date of adoption of Views: 28 October 1992 (forty -sixth session) his version of the facts. The State party indicated that copies of the Constitutional Court files had been consulted, but did not indicate whether any measures had been taken to implement the Committee’s recommendations. Response, dated 24 September 1996, of the Government of Peru to the Committee’s Views* In its submission dated 24 September 1996, the State party informed the Committee of investigations carried out in respect of the status of the case, and noted that a meeting had been held with the author himself, who had presented __________ * For the Committee’s Views, see this volume, supra, p. 68. _______________ Communication No. 277/1988 Submitted by: Marietta Terán Jijón joined by her son Juan Terán Jijón Date of communication: 21 January 1988 Alleged victim: Juan Terán Jijón State party: Ecuador Date of adoption of Views: 26 March 1992 (forty-fourth session) Committee. It simply provided a copy of a report containing the results of an investigation by the national police into the alleged criminal activities of the author of the communication. It failed to indicate the whereabouts of Mr. Terán Jijón. __________ Response, dated 11 June 1992, of the Government of Ecuador to the Committee’s Views* On 11 June 1992, the State party provided a formalistic reply in which it did not touch on any of the issues raised by the * For the Committee’s Views, see this volume, supra, p. 76. _______________ 130