40 A practical guide to the Istanbul Protocol – for lawyers Rehabilitation Rehabilitation is an important component of reparation and it is a right specifically recognised in international human rights instruments.168 The UN Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power stipulates that: “victims should receive the necessary material, medical, psychological and social assistance and support.” The Special Rapporteur on the right to reparation has noted that reparation should include medical and psychological care and other services as well as legal 169 These services may and social services. be provided “in kind” or the costs may form part of a monetary award. It is important to distinguish between indemnity paid as way of compensation (for material and/or moral damage) and money provided for rehabilitation purposes. Satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition Satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition refer to the range of measures that may contribute to the broader and longer-term restorative aims of reparation. A central component is the role of public acknowledgement of the violation, the victims’ right to know the truth and to hold the perpetrators 170 accountable. The Basic Principles on Reparation list measures like: cessation of continuing violations; judicial sanctions against persons responsible for the violations; an apology, including public acknowledgement of the facts and acceptance of responsibility; commemorations and tributes to the victims and implementing preventative measures, such as ensuring effective civilian control of military and security forces, protecting human rights defenders and persons in the legal, media and other related professions. 2. EFFECTIVE PROCEDURAL REMEDIES At the same time, international human rights law requires States to provide effective procedural remedies under domestic law to guarantee adequate reparations to victims of human rights violations. In other words, the right to reparation for torture and other human rights violations includes both, the right to substantive reparations/remedies (like compensation) and the right to effective procedural remedies to obtain them (i.e. access to civil, administrative and criminal avenues). This principle is incorporated in every international human rights instrument.171 In fact, the right to a remedy for a violation of a human right protected under any of the international instruments is itself a right expressly guaranteed by the same and, in case of fundamental human rights, it has been recognised as non-derogable.172 For example, procedural safeguards against torture and other forms of ill-treatment, like the right of access to a lawyer while in detention, are not subject to limitations or derogation. Accordingly, there is an independent and continuing obligation to provide effective domestic remedies to protect human rights: during peace or war, and when declaring a state of emergency. Human rights instruments guarantee both, the procedural right to an effective access to a fair hearing (through judicial and/or non-judicial remedies)173 and the substantive right to reparations (such as restitu174 tion, compensation and rehabilitation). A remedy must be effective in practice as well as in law, particularly in the sense that its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by acts or omissions by national authorities. 175 The nature of the procedural remedies (judicial, administrative or other) should be in accordance with the substantive rights violated and the effectiveness of the remedy in granting appropriate relief for such