CAT/C/63/D/673/2015 provided does not demonstrate that he would face a personal, foreseeable and real risk of torture if he were to be returned to Iran. 29 8. In the light of the above, the Committee considers that the information submitted by the complainant is insufficient to substantiate his claim that he would face a personal, foreseeable and real risk of torture if he were to be returned to Iran. 9. The Committee, acting under article 22 (7) of the Convention, finds that the return of the complainant to the Islamic Republic of Iran would not constitute a violation of article 3 of the Convention by the State party. 29 GE.18-12643 See, for example, M.K. v. Switzerland, (CAT/C/60/D/662/2015), paras. 7.8–7.9. 11