05 06 07 08 12.75 13.85 13.5 13.85 2.60 2.85 2.85 2.85 31.88 34.60 34.60 34.60 49.The Resolution’sdeterminations are widely heeded in the evaluation of architectonic projects financed with resources from the National Penitentiary Fund. This brings building standards up to an international level and makes possible a significant improvement of conditions of Brazilian prisons, thereby meeting SPT recommendations. 50.It should be further stressed that, for the proper individualization of the sentence at the execution stage, those convicted and interned are classified according to their criminal record and their personality, by the evaluation programme that individualizes the penalty of deprivation of liberty. The evaluation reports are prepared by a Classification Technical Commission in each establishment, chaired by the director and including, as a minimum, two services heads, a psychiatrist, a psychologist, and a social worker. B.Management improvement and modernization (a)Penitentiary system’s master plan 51.The Penitentiary System’s Master Plan is a major strategic monitoring instrument whose main objective is to bring together the federal and the state governments to improve prison conditions in Brazil. The project resulted from a partnership between the Federal Government, through DEPEN, and the 27 federation units represented by their penitentiary administration agencies. 52.The Master Plan is a planning instrument grounded on twelve targets established in tune with LEP and CNPCP guidelines to guarantee the rights of inmates and improve conditions under which they serve their sentences. It lists a set of actions to be carried out by the states and the Federal District in the short-, medium-, and long-term. 53.Preparation of this master plan started with a diagnostic of the prison situation in each Federation unit, which gathered quantitative and qualitative data and identified the main needs of each region. The result should be a more human system that is safe and appropriate to basic attention to incarcerated people. 54.The Master Plan targets are as follows: Target 01 Establishment of Board of Trustees or the equivalent Target 02 Target 03 Target 04 Target 05 Target 06 Target 07 Target 08 Target 09 Target 10 Target 11 Target 12 Target 13 Target 14 Target 15 Target 16 Target 17 Target 18 Target 19 Target 20 Target 21 Target 22 Incentive to the establishment of Community Councils Establishment of an independent and autonomous Ombudsman Service Establishment of a Judicial Administrative Office at each agency in charge of penitentiary administration Establishment of Discipline Councils in criminal establishments Establishment of Technical Commissions for Classification in every criminal establishment Drafting of a Penitentiary Statute and Bylaws Establishment or expansion of legal assistance services in every criminal unit Incentive to the expansion of Public Defender Offices for comprehensive attention to inmates Incentive to the application of penalties and measures instead of incarceration Establishment of a penitentiary worker career and drafting of a career plan Expansion of penitentiary staff Establishment of a Penitentiary Administration School Adherence to projects or agreements aimed at providing comprehensive health care for inmates Adherence to school, literacy, and vocational training programmes Establishment of literature spaces and building of collections Establishment of work infrastructure in criminal establishments Adherence to or preparation of projects for assisting inmates’ families Ongoing updating of data of the Penitentiary Information System-INFOPEN Building, expansion, or remodeling for increasing the number of incarceration vacancies Investment on equipping and reequipping criminal establishment Adherence to projects aimed at providing assistance to female inmates and former inmates. 55.DEPEN monitors and assesses compliance with the actions and timetable set for each target. (b)Alternative sentencing 56.It should be further noted that the Brazilian State’s endeavors to enhance the alternative methods of sentencing, under the National Program in Support of the Prison System and by the establishment of the National Alternative Sentencing Strategy (ENAPE), to ensure greater effectiveness in facing conflict and in achieving social pacification. ENAPE reinforces government policies to promote alternatives to incarceration and more effective measures to reduce violence and criminal recidivism, which have received greater emphasis as of 2000. This is illustrated by the psychosocial monitoring of sentences and alternative measures, which was recognized as a good practice at the Twelfth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice held in Salvador/Bahia in 2010 and at the First National Conference on Public Security (Conseg) in 2009, which defined the need to favor alternatives to deprivation of liberty as a principle.