1.2 Obiski policijskih postaj 1.2 Visits to police stations Dokumentacija Documentation Pregled dokumentacije je pokazal, da je ta večinoma skrbno urejena. The review of documentation revealed that it was carefully maintained for the most part. Kljub omenjenemu pa smo opazili nekatere nedoslednosti, netočnosti in nepravilnosti pri izpolnjevanju podatkov v dokumentaciji: In spite of the above, the following discrepancies, inaccuracies and irregularities when completing data were detected: • DPM je na PP Trebnje pri naključno izbranih primerih opazil, da je bil obrazec »Izvajanje opravil med pridržanjem/zadržanjem – uradni zaznamek« izpolnjen le do 12.15 in da ni razvidno, kaj se je z osebo dogajalo do konca pridržanja, torej do 13.10, zato je predlagal, da je trba policiste opozoriti na dosledno izpolnjevanje vseh rubrik. Poleg tega je DPM ugotovil, da se sklep o pridržanju in FIO-evidenca v enem od primerov časovno nista ujemala, zato je uskladitev med njima predlagal tudi v svojem končnem poročilu. Iz enega od preverjenih primerov pa tudi ni bilo jasno, v katerem prostoru za pridržanje je bila oseba, zato je DPM predlagal, da policiste ponovno opozorijo na dosledno evidentiranje vseh podatkov v obrazce, ki so potrebni za izvedbo pridržanja. MNZ je v zvezi s tem sporočilo, da je dotična PP na delovnem sestanku policiste opozorila na zgoraj navedene nedoslednosti in poudarila na dosledno evidentiranje relevantnih podatkov. • In randomly selected case at Trebnje PP, the NPM discovered that the form, “Implementation of tasks during detention – official note,” had only been completed by 12:15 and what was happening to the person from that time and up to the end of the detention was not recorded, i.e. until 13:10. The NPM proposed that police officers be asked to consistently complete all sections. The NPM also noticed that a decision on detention and the record on the phonetic index of persons did not comply in time and thus proposed their harmonisation in its final report. It was also not clear in one case in which detention room the person was being held and the NPM thus suggested that police officers be again asked to consistently record all data on the forms necessary for the execution of detention. Relating to this case, the MNZ reported that the relevant PP informed its police officers about the above inconsistencies at a working meeting and stressed the consistent recording of relevant data. • PP Novo mesto je bila s strani DPM opozorjena le na natančno izpolnjevanje obrazcev, ki so potrebni ob pridržanju, predvsem na vnašanje točnih ur posameznih dogodkov ali ukrepov, saj pri enem od naključno izbranih primerov ni bilo jasno, kdaj je bila pridržani osebi odločba dejansko vročena. MNZ se je na očitek DPM odzvalo z obvestilom, da bo glede izpolnjevanja dokumentacije o odvzemu prostosti PP Novo mesto izvedla izobraževanje in policiste dodatno opozorila na pravilno izpolnjevanje obrazcev. • The NPM warned Novo mesto PP about the accurate completion of forms necessary for detention, particularly the entry of exact times of individual events or measures, since it was not clear in one of the randomly selected cases when the decision was actually handed over to the detainee. The MNZ responded to this NPM comment that Novo mesto PP would organise an education course on completing of documentation on detention and further emphasise the correct entry of data. • Tudi PP Ptuj je bila s strani DPM opozorjena na natančno izpolnjevanje obrazcev pridržanja, saj iz prvega naključno izbranega primera ni bilo razvidno, ali je bila pridržani osebi ponujena voda (ker je bila pridržana v prostoru, kjer tekoče vode ni), v drugem primeru pa se iz dokumentacije ni dalo razbrati podatka o zaključku pridržanja. MNZ se je na navedeno odzvalo tako, da je DPM obvestilo, da bo PP Ptuj policiste na delovnih posvetih opozorila na natančnost pri izpolnjevanju obrazcev. • The NPM also warned Ptuj PP about the detailed completion of detention forms, since it was not possible to discern from the first randomly selected case if water was offered to the detainee (because they were accommodated in a room with no running water), and in the second case, it was impossible to acquire information about the completion of detention from the documentation. The MNZ informed the NPM that Ptuj PP would inform its police officers at working meetings about accuracy when completing forms. • Pri preverjanju naključno izbranega primera na PP Gornja Radgona je DMP ugotovil pomanjkljivost v zvezi s podatkom, v katerem prostoru je bila pridržana oseba nameščena, na kar je v svojem poročilu tudi opozoril. MNZ je odgovorilo, da je vodstvo PP Gornja Radgona policiste opozorilo na dosledno izpolnjevanje obrazcev. • When reviewing a randomly selected case at Gornja Radgona PP, the NPM established a deficiency relating to data specifying the room in which the detainee was being held, which it also pointed out in its report. The MNZ replied that the management of Gornja Radgona PP had informed its police officers about consistent completion of forms. • Podobno pomanjkljivost je DPM odkril tudi ob pregledu enega od primerov na PP Trbovlje, kjer ni bilo evidentirano, ali je bila pridržani osebi ob namestitvi ponujena oziroma izročena posteljnina. Vodstvo PP Trbovlje je prek odzivnega poročila MNZ sporočilo DPM, da je policiste na pomanjkljivost opozorilo. • A similar deficiency was also discovered when reviewing a case at Trbovlje PP, where it was not recorded whether the detainee was offered or handed over bed linen upon their accommodation. The management of Trbovlje PP informed the NPM through the MNZ response report that the police officers had been warned about the deficiency. • Na PP Litija sta iz spisovne dokumentacije izhajali dve nepravilnosti, in sicer je bilo v enem od primerov navedeno napačno leto vročitve sklepa, iz drugega pa ni bilo razvidno, kaj se je z osebo dogajalo v času med 23.50 (začetek postopka) in 1.30 (oseba je bila prepeljana v CP Ljubljana). MNZ je v odzivnem poročilu pojasnilo podrobnosti o nezapisanih dogodkih in sporočilo, da bodo policisti o natančnem izpolnjevanju obrazcev dodatno opozorjeni. • Two irregularities were noted in file documentation at Litija PP, i.e. an incorrect year of service of the decision was provided in one case, and in the second case, it was not clear what was happening to the detainee between 23:50 (start of procedure) and 1:30 (the person was transported to Ljubljana Police Detention Centre). In its response report, the MNZ explained the details of the events which had not been recorded and stated that police officers would be additionally warned about accurately completing forms. • PP Litija je bila opozorjena tudi zaradi dejstva, da je iz dokumentacije enega od preverjenih primerov izhajalo, da je bila oseba poučena v »slovenskem – maternem jeziku«. DPM je na tem mestu priporočil, da se v evidenco zapiše le, v katerem jeziku je bila oseba poučena, čemur je MNZ v svojem odzivnem poročilu pritrdilo, saj je vodstvo PP Litija o tem seznanilo policiste na naslednjem delovnem sestanku. 70 poročilo o izvajanju nalog DPM v letu 2014 DržavnI preventivnI mehanizEm po Opcijskem protokolu h Konvenciji OZN proti mučenju in drugim krutim, nečloveškim ali poniževalnim kaznim ali ravnanju • Litija PP was also warned about the fact that the documentation on one of examined case stated that the person had been informed in “Slovenian – mother tongue”. At this point, the NPM recommended that only the language in which a person is informed be entered in the record to which the MNZ agreed in its response report, since the management of Litija PP had already informed its police officers about the relevant matter at their next working meeting. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE NPM IN 2014 National Preventive Mechanism under the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 71