1.2 Obiski policijskih postaj 1.2 Visits to police stations Delovne razmere za zaposlene Working conditions for employees DPM ugotavlja, da policisti delajo v večinoma dobrih delovnih razmerah. Izjemi sta bili: The NPM established that police officers generally enjoyed good working conditions. The exceptions were: • PP Trebnje, kjer so garderobni prostori premajhni, moški in ženski prostori pa niso ločeni, zato je DPM predlagal, da se proučijo možnosti ločenih garderobnih prostorov, na kar je MNZ sporočilo, da bo ta možnost proučena; • PP Logatec, kjer ni dovolj pisarn za delo policistov, policisti nimajo na voljo opreme za video in zvočno snemanje, primanjkuje pa tudi garderobnih omaric (približno ena omarica na dva policista). Prostorsko stisko sicer poskušajo reševati tako, da večjo pisarno, ki je v pritličju in v kateri so mize in računalnik, policisti uporabljajo tako za sestanke kot za izvajanje zaslišanj in tudi za dodaten garderobni prostor, saj je v pisarni nameščen obešalnik z imeni in priimki policistov, na katerega slednji obešajo svoja službena oblačila. V zvezi s tem je MNZ sporočilo, da bo večja pisarna v prihodnje namenjena le postopkom z osebami, ki jim je odvzeta prostost, vendar pa to prostorske stiske na tej PP ne rešuje. Kontrolni obisk Centra za pridržanje Ljubljana (CP) V okviru DPM je bil izveden tudi kontrolni obisk CP Ljubljana, in sicer po predhodni napovedi 27. 5. 2014. Namen tega obiska je bil preveriti uresničitve priporočil DPM s prejšnjega obiska. Pri obisku so sodelovali tudi udeleženci srečanja v okviru mreže »South-East Europe NPM Network«. Ob prejšnjem obisku je DPM prosil za sporočilo razlogov za zmanjšanje števila dežurnih policistov v izmeni in pojasnilo, ali takšno zmanjšanje še vedno ustreza varnostnim vidikom oziroma standardom, na kar je MNZ odgovorilo, da se število policistov prilagaja operativnim potrebam in da se posledično število dežurnih policistov spreminja, kar pa navkljub temu ustreza varnostnim standardom. Ob kontrolnem obisku je bilo ugotovljeno, da se organizacija dela dejansko prilagaja operativnim potrebam in da CP v zvezi z zagotavljanjem zadostnega števila policistov nima težav. Med zadnjim obiskom tega centra je DPM predlagal, da je treba policiste policijskih postaj, ki so odredile pridržanje, opozoriti na potrebno pozornost, natančnost in nujnost izpolnjevanja vseh rubrik uradnih obrazcev, odgovor MNZ pa se je glasil, da je PU Ljubljana policijske enote večkrat pisno opozorila na nepravilnosti, vključno s potrebno pozornostjo, natančnostjo in nujnostjo izpolnjevanja vseh rubrik uradnih obrazcev, ki jih morajo policisti izdelati v zvezi s pridržanjem in pravilnim načinom njihovega popravljanja. Ob kontrolnem obisku je bil opravljen pregled štirih naključno izbranih primerov pridržanj, pri čemer so bile pri dveh primerih ugotovljene nepravilnosti. V prvem primeru v potrdilu o zaseženih predmetih, ki jih pridržana oseba ne sme imeti pri sebi, ni bila izpolnjena rubrika »zaključeno z zaporedno številko«, poleg tega pa je bil popravljen datum izdaje obrazca s 13. na 14. 4. 2014, pri čemer ni evidentirano (signirano), kdo je to popravo opravil; v drugem primeru je DPM ugotovil, da se je v FIO-evidenco vnesel podatek (ura) o začetka postopka z osebo na podlagi drugega odstavka 157. člena ZKP, pri tem pa DPM natančnega pojasnila, od kdaj in na kateri podlagi se takšen način vnosa v FIOevidenco opravlja, v času obiska ni prejel. DPM je v zvezi s tem ugotovil, da se nekatere pomanjkljivosti pri izpolnjevanju obrazcev še vedno pojavljajo in v zvezi s tem predlagal, da se policiste pogosteje opozarja na ugotovljene napake in da tudi starešine enot redno spremljajo te postopke in v primeru ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti že sami izvedejo potrebne ukrepe, da do njih ne bi več prihajalo. Ob obisku smo opozorili tudi na to, da na sprehajališču ni pepelnika in zato predlagali, da se preučijo možnosti glede njegove namestitve, saj pridržane osebe čas bivanja na prostem izkoristijo tudi za kajenje. Predlagali smo tudi, da se pridržanim osebam omogoči možnost uporabe prhe in zamenjave oblačil, in sicer predvsem v primerih, ko so v Center za pridržanje Ljubljana morda pripeljane umazane ali pa bi iz katerega koli drugega razloga potrebovale prhanje. • Trebnje PP, where changing rooms were too small, and men’s and women’s areas were not separated, which is why the NPM suggested examining the possibility of separate changing rooms to which the MNZ replied that this possibility would be examined; • Logatec PP, which had an insufficient number of offices for police officers; police officers had insufficient equipment for video and audio recording, and there was also an insufficient number of lockers (approximately one locker for two police officers). They addressed the lack of space by using the larger office on the ground floor, which contained desks and a computer for meetings, interrogation and additional wardrobe space, because a hanger was installed in the office with the names and surnames of the police officers on which they hang their work clothes. In this regard, the MNZ responded that the larger office would in future be intended only for procedures with persons deprived of their liberty; however, this fails to resolve the spatial issue. Control visit to Ljubljana Police Detention Centre The NPM also conducted a control visit to Ljubljana Police Detention Centre, i.e. after a prior notification on 27 May 2014. The purpose of the visit was to verify the realisation of the NPM recommendations from the previous visit. The participants of the meeting within the “South-East Europe NPM Network” also participated at the visit. On the occasion of the previous visit, the NPM had requested to be informed of the reasons for reducing the number of duty police officers in a shift, and an explanation of whether such a reduction still complied with the safety aspect or standards, to which the MNZ replied that the number of police officers was being adjusted to operational needs and that as a result the number of duty officers was changing, but still complied with safety standards. Upon the control visit, it was established that the organisation of work was actually being adjusted to operational needs and that the Police Detention Centre did not have problems assuring a sufficient number of officers. During the last visit to the centre, the NPM suggested that officers from police stations which ordered detention be informed about due attention, accuracy and urgency of completing all sections of official forms. The MNZ replied that Ljubljana Police Directorate had notified police units several times in writing about irregularities, including due attention, accuracy and urgency of completing all sections of official forms which police officers have to complete relating to detention and suitably correcting them. During the control visit, a review of four randomly selected cases of detention was conducted, whereby irregularities were established in two cases. In the first case, the statement on seized items which the person detained could not keep in their possession was not complete under the item “completed with consecutive number”; furthermore, the date of issuing the form was corrected from 13 to 14 April 2014, whereby it was not recorded (signed) who implemented this correction. In the second case, the NPM established that data (time) on the start of the procedure was entered in the record on the phonetic index of persons on the basis of the second paragraph of Article 157 of the ZKP, whereby the NPM did not receive a detailed explanation about since when and on what basis this manner of entry has been implemented in the record on phonetic index of persons. In this regard, the NPM established that when completing forms, certain deficiencies still occurred and suggested that police officers be more frequently warned about the established errors and that senior officers regularly monitor these procedures, and in the case of established discrepancies take the necessary measures to ensure such deficiencies do not occur. During the visit, we also pointed out that an ashtray was missing from the recreation area and proposed that the possibility of providing one be considered, since detainees also smoke during time spent outside. We also suggested that detainees be enabled to use a shower and change their clothes, particularly in cases when detainees are brought to Ljubljana Police Detention Centre dirty, or if they need a shower for any other reason. 76 poročilo o izvajanju nalog DPM v letu 2014 DržavnI preventivnI mehanizEm po Opcijskem protokolu h Konvenciji OZN proti mučenju in drugim krutim, nečloveškim ali poniževalnim kaznim ali ravnanju IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE NPM IN 2014 National Preventive Mechanism under the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 77