For example, on August 4, 2014, B.N.A. appealed to the National Centre with a statement that on August 2, her grandson was alleged to cruel treatment by the police officers. As a result of the beatings, he lost consciousness. After the grandson recovered consciousness, he and his friends were taken to the Alamudyn DIAB of the Chui region. From the records of the first aid station: - "B.A. came to the first aid station with a diagnosis of “Cut wound of the right corner of the eye and cheekbone on the right. Abrasion and displacement of the bruised forearm." The injuries of B. required emergency surgery in the right eye. The National Centre sent an appeal to the prosecutor of the Alamudun district to take appropriate measures, but the prosecutor’s office of the Alamudun district unreasonably sent this statement for the investigation to the Issyk-Ata RIAB, in violation of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic:49 the Prosecutor's Office is a single system, which is responsible for: 6) the prosecution of public officials. An appeal on this subject was sent to the General Prosecutor of the Kyrgyz Republic; in turn, the General Prosecutor's Office of the Kyrgyz Republic redirected the appeal to the prosecutor’s office of the Chui region. From the response of the deputy of the prosecutor’s office of the Chui region: The statement of B. indicated that on August 2, 2014, at about 08:00 PM, unknown people beat the grandson of B. N. without reason, in the territory of HPP-5; three of the assailants were in police uniforms and two in civilian clothes; the two in civilian clothes beat him. Meanwhile, the staff of the police department did not take any action to stop the beating. On this incident, a senior investigator of the Investigative Department of the IAB of the Issyk-Ata district, Dzhumagulov A., made a decision to dismiss the criminal case on the basis of the CPC of KR Article 28, Part 1, Paragraph 2. However, on October 3, 2014, the prosecutor’s office of the Chui region overruled the decision of the Investigative Department of the IAB of the Issyk-Ata district, A. Djumagulov, on refusal to institute criminal proceedings, dated September 05, 2014, and materials were sent to the prosecutor’s office of the Issyk-Ata district. This indicates a low level of response of the prosecution; more often, what happens is that territorial prosecution authorities are engaged only in “unsubscribing,” and the perpetrators are not punished. The prosecutor's office of the Issyk-Ata district did not provide any information on the case, in spite of a written request and repeated verbal requests. 49 Article 104, paragraph 6. National Centre of the Kyrgyz Republic on the Prevention of Torture | 67