4 Legal Implications in case Trafficking in
Human Beings Amounts to Torture or other
Forms of Ill-treatment
This section explores the legal implications when trafficking in human beings amounts to torture or other forms of
ill-treatment. Differences in the legal standards given by
the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking
in Persons, especially Women and Children, supplementing the UN Convention against Transnational Organized
Crime as well as the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings and the UN Convention against Torture are shown below.
4.1 The Principle of Non-refoulement
4.1.1 The Principle of Non-refoulement in General
The prohibition of refoulement is an important principle
of international law. In general, the principle sets out that
a State violates the absolute prohibition of torture even in
cases in which authorities expel or extradite a person to
another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that the person would be in danger of being subjected to torture.103 Nevertheless, different standards of application of this principle can be seen in different human
rights treaties. Art. 3 UNCAT limits this principle to cases
of torture only and it is not applicable to other forms of
ill-treatment. In contrast, the ECtHR also applies the nonrefoulement principle to cases of CIDT.104 The prohibition
of torture and other forms of ill-treatment in Art. 3 ECHR
does not specifically refer to the prohibition of refoulement.
Nevertheless, the ECtHR interpreted it also as prohibiting
return in situations in which the individual would face a
real risk of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment.105 The principle of non-refoulement can also be
found in the Inter-American human rights law. The InterAmerican Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture106 requires in Art. 13 that a person not be extradited or returned
to a country “when there are grounds to believe […] that he
will be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment”. Furthermore, Art. 22 (8) of the American
Convention on Human Rights107 states that no one should
be returned to a country where the person’s right to life or
personal freedom might be in danger because of race, nationality, religion, social status, or political opinion. Moreover, non-refoulement builds an important principle within
the refugee context. The Refugee Convention108 prohibits
expulsion or return of a refugee to territories where the “life
or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or
political opinion”. 109 The Refugee Convention allows derogation from the principle of non-refoulement where there
are reasonable grounds for regarding a refugee to be a danger to the security of the country in which she or he resides
or a refugee has been convicted of a particularly serious
crime which constitutes a danger to the community of the
country. In contrast, non-refoulement under human rights
law is absolute and non-derogable.110 The Palermo Protocol stipulates in Art. 14 that the provisions of the protocol
shall not affect the principle of non-refoulement in the context of asylum. Similarly, the CoE Convention also stresses
the obligation and responsibility of States to adhere to the
principle of non-refoulement in the context of asylum. Although mentioned in the context of asylum in these treaties
concerning trafficking in human beings, the protection of
non-refoulement is much broader than asylum111 and international protection needs are assessed on a wider basis than
in the Refugee Convention.
American Convention on Human
Rights “Pact of San Jose, Costa Rica”
non-refoulement
The Prohibition of Torture and Ill-treatment in the Inter-American Human Rights System:
A Handbook for Victims and their Advocates,
Convention relating to the Status of Refugees
The United Nations Convention against Torture:
A Commentary
The International Law of Human Trafficking
Complementary Protection in International Refugee Law
Case of
Soering v UK
Inter-American Convention to Prevent
and Punish Torture,
28
111
The International Law of Human Trafficking
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents