CHANCELLOR OF JUSTICE AS NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM
PART IV
PART III
PART II
PART I
prefectures. The causes of deaths could be divided in three broad categories: poisoning, serious
illness and suicide.
As a result of investigating the circumstances of the deaths, the Chancellor made the following
recommendations to the PBGB:
1) to ensure effective supervision of detainees in the cells (e.g. through a peephole or
hatch in a door in combination with video surveillance) and install video surveillance in
the cells in Tallinn sobering-up facility;
2) to change the practice of distribution of narcotic and psychotropic medicines to
detainees, so that each time a staff member of the detention centre must be satisfied
that a detainee has actually administered the medicine. If a detention centre has
medical staff, they should be involved in the distribution of narcotic or psychotropic
medicines to detainees to monitor the administration of the medicine;
3) to consider organising training of officers in charge of the detention chambers on
the effects of narcotic and psychotropic medicines and assessment of the health of
persons placed for sobering up;
4) to improve effectiveness of the search of cells where persons using narcotic and/or
psychotropic medicines are placed.
In addition, the Chancellor asked the Director General of the PBGB to provide an overview of
how the police have complied with the tasks set out in the Minister of Internal Affairs letter No
9-2/65-3 of 17 September 2012, which also concerned the death cases of detained persons and
which were prompted by the Chancellor’s analysis of the deaths of detained persons in 2011.
The Director General of the PBGB agreed with the Chancellor’s recommendations and noted
that training events and study days on the issues observed by the Chancellor have already
been organised for officers in charge of supervision of detainees and these efforts will continue
in 2014. For example, the PBGB training plans for 2014 include a follow-up training on the
nature of narcotic intoxication and the effect of medicines used to alleviate it.
2.
Expulsion centre (detention centre for foreigners)
In 2013, advisers to the Chancellor carried out an unannounced inspection visit and a follow-up
visit to the expulsion centre of the PBGB:
−− inspection visit to the PBGB expulsion centre (since 1 October 2013 called the detention
centre for foreigners) (case No 7-7/130203);
−− follow-up inspection visit to the PBGB detention centre for foreigners (case No
7-7/131436).
A general practitioner was involved in the inspection visit as an expert.
On 1 October 2013, the expulsion centre was renamed the detention centre for foreigners,
following a change in the legal grounds for the detention of asylum seekers. Therefore, the
Chancellor pointed out that reorganisation of the centre requires more focus on the distinct
nature of the situation of asylum seekers. Inter alia, it is necessary to take into consideration
different eating traditions and provide psychological counselling to people who do not speak
the foreign languages most commonly used in our region.
The Chancellor’s previous inspection visit to the expulsion centre took place in 2011.
2.1.
16
Application of coercion
As a result of the inspection, the Chancellor dealt with the issue of legality of the use of
handcuffs. Specifically, it was found that handcuffs were usually used in case of escorting
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents