Similarly to the previous years, the largest number of proceedings fell within the area of government of the Ministry of Justice and the majority of these were still related to criminal enforcement law and imprisonment law (see Table 5) and were initiated on the basis of petitions by prisoners. In 78.9% of the proceedings within the area of government of the Ministry of Justice, no substantive proceedings were initiated. In 2012, this indicator was the same. PART I STATISTICS OF PROCEEDINGS Harju County local authorities, except Tallinn city 45 2 10 2 6 35 Tallinn 59 1 8 3 5 50 Hiiu County local authorities 1 0 0 0 0 1 Ida-Viru County local authorities, except Narva city 8 1 1 0 1 6 Narva 7 0 0 0 0 7 Jõgeva County local authorities 3 1 0 0 0 2 Järva County local authorities 3 0 1 0 1 2 Lääne County local authorities 1 0 0 0 0 1 Lääne-Viru County local authorities 7 0 1 1 0 6 Põlva County local authorities 6 0 5 2 0 1 Pärnu County local authorities 15 0 2 0 2 13 Rapla County local authorities 5 0 0 0 0 5 Saare County local authorities 5 0 0 0 0 5 Tartu County local authorities, except Tartu city 20 7 3 0 3 10 Tartu 11 0 1 0 1 10 Valga County local authorities 5 0 1 1 0 4 Viljandi County local authorities 5 0 1 0 1 4 Võru County local authorities 5 0 1 0 1 4 Agency, body, person Finding of violaNo protion of lawfulness ceedings or good adminisconducted trative practice PART III Proceedings initiated Finding of conflict with the Constitution or an Act PART IV Cases opened Pending proceedings or proceedings with no outcome PART II Table 3. Distribution of cases by respondents on local government level 81