A/HRC/7/3/Add.1 page 152 Para 127. Country Date Type Mandate Allegations transmitted R. G. D. (A/HRC/4/33/Add.1, para. 131). Government response officers. R.I. has stated that she does not know the chief of the internal affairs office, that neither he nor other internal affairs officers beat her, and that her miscarriage was not related to the actions of law enforcement bodies. According to the information provided by Tashkumyr Hospital, R.I. miscarriage was caused by psychological stress; there were no indications that she had been subjected to violence. She was placed in a psychiatric hospital where she received the necessary medical care. On 6 October 2006, the Jalalabad procurator’s office decided not to institute criminal proceedings owing to the lack of evidence that the police officers had committed an offence. This decision was well-founded, and no reasons have been adduced for rescinding it. It has not been established that R.I.’s rights, either at the time of her arrest or during the investigation, were violated. Considering that R.I. was accused of committing particularly serious offences and that, as a result of her actions, officers of the Jalalabad province internal affairs office received serious bodily harm, there is no provision in Kyrgyzstan’s national legislation that would make R.I. or members of her family eligible for monetary or other compensation. By letter dated 22/03/07, the Government informed that on 23 April 2005 the investigation department of the Issyk-Kul district internal affairs office of Issyk-Kul province of Kyrgyzstan instituted criminal proceedings on the basis of evidence of an offence contrary to article 129, paragraph 1 (Rape), of the Code of Criminal