29 of public interest, I may report it to the National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information.86 I did not avail myself of this possibility in 2015. 5.4.4. Making the NPM’s reports public “The reports of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights shall be public.” Published reports may not contain personal data, classified data, secrets protected by an Act or secrets restricted to the exercise of a profession.87 I always send my reports on the visits of the NPM to the head of the place of detention concerned, the addressees of the recommendations, the members of the Civil Consultative Body and the Hungarian member of the CPT. I have to make my reports available to anyone without restrictions, electronically, free of charge on the homepage of my Office. The NPM’s reports are made publicly available to anyone by my colleagues, in Hungarian, within a couple of days after having sent them to the above listed addressees. The reports of the NPM have to be deposited, within thirty days upon their publication, in the Office’s digital archives as well.88 Due to the lack of appropriate financial resources, there is only one report that I could publish in English in its entirety. The costs of translating the report on the NPM’s visit to the Debrecen Guarded Refugee Reception Center to English were borne by the UNHCR Regional Representation for Central Europe. The English language summaries of the reports on the other visits were published on the homepage of my Office within thirty days upon their publication. 5.5. Dialog on the NPM’s recommendations Pursuant to Article 22 of the OPCAT, the “competent authorities of the State Party concerned shall examine the recommendations of the national preventive mechanism and enter into a dialogue with it on possible implementation measures”. Although the recommendations of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights are not binding, the Ombudsman Act compels the authority concerned to give a meaningful response to the conclusions and critical remarks of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights and his initiatives aimed at the elimination of the anomalies discovered. The Ombudsman Act even specifies the deadline for such responses. The aforementioned provisions have to be complied with not only in my general activities aimed at the protection of fundamental rights, but also in the course of performing the tasks of the NPM. If the authority subject to inquiry is able to terminate the impropriety related to fundamental rights within its competence, I may initiate redress of the impropriety by the head of the authority subject to inquiry. Such initiative may be made directly by phone, orally or by e-mail. In such cases the date, manner and substance of the initiative have to be recorded in the case file. Within thirty days of receipt of the initiative the authority subject to inquiry has to inform me of its position on the merits of the initiative and on the measures taken. 89 If the authority subject to inquiry does not agree with the initiative, it has to, within thirty days of receipt of the initiative, See Section 36 of the Ombudsman Act See Section 28, Subsection (2) of the Ombudsman Act 88 See Section 39, Subsection (1) of Directive 2/2012. (January 20) AJB on the professional rules and methods of investigations by the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights 89 See Section 32, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Ombudsman Act 86 87