83 traffic of internationally controlled products and technologies, to control plans, to observations and the issuing of search warrants, or to military matters. (5) In the course of his/her inquiries affecting the investigative organ of the Prosecution Service, the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights may not inspect a) personal data of witnesses, if the closed processing thereof has been ordered on the basis of the Act on Criminal Procedure, b) documents of the investigative organ of the Prosecution Service originating from intelligence information gathering, c) any document specified in subsection (2) to (4), in relation to organs gathering intelligence information, relating to, originating from or pertaining to the cooperation of the investigative organ of the Prosecution Service with organs gathering intelligence information, or e) documents enabling the identification of a private person covertly cooperating with the police, except when that person has suffered the infringement of rights and he himself or she herself requests the inquiry thereof, (6) In the course of his/her inquiry affecting the tasks of the National Security Authority, specified in the Act on the Protection of Classified Information, the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights may not inspect documents relating to the professional direction, authorization or supervision of encoding activities. (7) If, in order to ensure the complete clarification of a case, the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights considers it necessary that the documents specified in subsections (1) to (6) also be inspected, he/she may request the competent Minister to have those documents inspected. The competent Minister shall make the inquiry or shall have it made and inform the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights on the outcome of the inquiry within the time-limit set by the Commissioner. The time-limit may not be shorter than thirty days. Section 24 – (1) If there are substantiated grounds to believe that if the measure of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights is delayed, the fundamental rights of a larger group of natural persons will be seriously infringed, the person conducting the inquiry on the basis of the authorization of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights may draw the attention of the head of the authority subject to inquiry to the danger of infringement and shall simultaneously initiate a measure of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights. Such indication of danger shall be recorded in the case file. (2) If, in the course of his/her inquiry, certain circumstances come to the attention of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights from which circumstances one may conclude that a coercive measure has been unlawfully ordered, he/she shall immediately inform the competent prosecutor through the Prosecutor General. If the coercive measure has been ordered by the Prosecution Service, the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights shall inform the court as well. Section 25 – (1) In the interest of conducting and planning the inquiries of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights, the authority subject to inquiry, the head of the authority subject to inquiry, the head of the supervisory organ of the authority subject to inquiry, the head of the organ otherwise authorized by a legal rule to conduct inquiries and the employees of the authority subject to inquiry shall cooperate with the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights in the cases determined in subsection (1) of Section 21. (2) If the authority subject to inquiry, without a well-founded reason, fails to comply or complies only belatedly with its obligation to cooperate, the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights shall mention this fact in his/her report, and make special mention thereof in his/her annual report. Section 26 – (1) In the inquiries conducted by the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights, the persons or organizations not qualifying as authority pursuant to this Act as well as the authorities not affected by the inquiry shall be obliged to cooperate.