E/CN.4/2006/6/Add.6 page 34 guanjiao zhizhi zai ya renyuan bianda fanren 6 xiaoshi zhi qi siwang], Boxun (Online), 8 February 05 (citing Heilongjiang Daily story on the case); Supreme People’s Procuratorate 2004 Work Report [Zuigao renmin jianchayuan 2004 nian gongzuo baogao], 9 March 05 (noting that a yearlong investigation uncovered more than 1,595 cases of torture, illegal detention, and other violations of human rights in 2003); “‘Nie Shubin Murder Case’ Still Unresolved” [‘Nie Shubin yuan sha an’ xuaner weijue], Southern Weekend (Online), 24 March 05; “Murdered Wife Lives, Proves Husbands Innocence”, China Daily (Online), 4 April 05 (indicating that She Xianglin was beaten and had fingers broken during his interrogation); “14 Years of An Unjust Case of Wife Murder, ‘Liaoning’s She Xianglin’ Li Huawei Obtains State Compensation” [14 nian sha qi yuanan ‘Liaoning She Xianglin’ Li Huawei huo guojia peichang], People’s Daily (Online), 15 April 05; Lei Dao, “Why No Compensation After Eight Years of Unjust Imprisonment” [Ba nian yuanyu weihe bu peichang], Legal Daily (Online), 17 April 05. Fu Kuanzhi”, Three Essential Elements That Must Be Put Forth to Put a Stop to Torture” [Dujue xingshi bigong xu jubei sange yausu], Procuratorial Daily (Online), 11 August 04 (stating not all evidence should be included if proven to be true, but that improve technology, better legal consciousness, and more reliance on material evidence necessary to combat torture); Li Jinlin, “China Law Society Opens Research Forum on the Torture Problem”, [Zhongguo faxuehui zhaokai xingxun bigong wenti yanjiu zuotanhui], Procuratorial Daily (Online), 30 January 05 (citing poor investigative capacity and the use of case breaking rates to evaluate personnel); “Return of “Murdered Wife” Calls China’s Judicial System in Question”, People’s Daily (Online), 5 April 05 (citing pressure from above to solve cases); Cheng Jishan, “Radical Measures to Policies Eliminate The Extortion of Confessions Through Torture” [Xiaochu xingxun bigong de zhiben zhice], Legal Daily (Online), 13 April 05 (citing lack of legal rules excluding all evidence derived from torture, presumptions of guilt by law enforcement, and the failure to prosecute torture cases); “Don’t Allow the Wings of Justice to break: Using Unjust Cases to Look at Confessions Extorted Through Torture” [Bie rang zhengyi zheduan le chibang: cong mianan kan xingxun bigong], Legal Daily, 22 April 05 (citing numerous factors, including low quality and educational levels of investigative personnel, leadership and social pressure to break cases, the link between salaries/promotions and case breaking rates, lack of lawyers at interrogation). 54 “Study of the Prevention of and Counter Measures for The Extortion of Confessions”, China Legal Studies Associations’ Group On The Prevention of the Use of Torture in Interrogation, March 2005; Suggestions for Enhancing the Rights of Lawyers [Wei zhengjin lvshi quanli jianyan xiance], China Legal Publicity (Online), November 2004 (a Ministry of Justice Web site, noting that torture is “widespread” in basic level organs); Qin Ping, “How Local Criminal Evidence Standards Guarantee Implementation of the Criminal Procedure Law” [Difang de xingshi zhengju guifan ruhe baozhang xingshi susongfa de zhixing], Legal Daily (Online), 22 April 05 (characterizing the She Xianglin case as a “typical” case); “Return of “Murdered Wife” Calls China’s Judicial System in Question”, People’s Daily (Online), 5 April 05 (citing an unnamed law professor as stating, “Although strictly forbidden by law, forced confession has been common in many places in China because the police are often under great pressure from above to solve criminal cases.”). An identical quote appeared in Xinhua and China Daily stories on the She Xianglin case; Cheng Jishan, “Radical Measures to Policies Eliminate The Extortion of Confessions Through Torture” [Xiaochu xingxun bigong de zhiben zhice], Legal Daily