ELECTIONS 9
ACTIVITIES
The findings and recommendations
of election observation reports are
often a basis for the Office’s other
programmes, as well as for the activities of other OSCE institutions and
field operations. In 2016, ODIHR’s
election-related activities focused on
observing elections, following-up on
observation missions and their recommendations, strengthening the
Office’s election observation methodology, and training observers.
ELECTION OBSERVATION
ODIHR has assessed electoral processes in all but one of the OSCE participating States for their compliance
with OSCE commitments, international obligations and other standards for
democratic elections. In 2016, ODIHR
deployed missions to, among others,
two of the largest OSCE participating States the Russian Federation and
the United States of America. ODIHR
also responded to a growing number
of early or unanticipated elections,
including in Kazkahstan, the former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,
Moldova and Uzbekistan.
In line with the Office’s well-established methodology, an election observation process begins with the deployment of a needs assessment mission
(NAM) several months before an election, to assess the pre-election environment. Based on this assessment,
the NAM recommends — whether to
carry out an observation activity and,
if so, what type of activity would best
meet the needs identified. In 2016,
ODIHR conducted 20 NAMs.
In line with the recommendations of
NAMs, the Office deployed 15 election-related activities to 14 OSCE
participating States. This included 11
full-scale election observation missions (EOMs), comprising long- and
short-term observers that are seconded by participating States; one
limited election observation mission
(LEOM), which included long- but not
short-term observers; two election
assessment missions (EAMs) comprising a core team of experts but no
long- or short-term observers; and one
Election Expert Team (EET), which
included a limited number of experts
to focus on specific issues.
Some 3,500 observers from 52 participating States took part in ODIHR
observation activities in 2016. To
support the participation of observers from countries that do not
generally second observers and to
redress shortfalls in secondments,
ODIHR uses the extra-budgetary
Diversification and Sustainability Fund.
In 2016, the fund enabled the deployment of 30 long- and 33 short-term
observers, 52.38 per cent of whom
were women. The continued support
of OSCE participating States for these
extra-budgetary programmes is instrumental in ensuring full and diverse
representation in election observation
missions.
The purpose of election observation
is to offer constructive feedback and
provide concrete recommendations to
remedy identified shortcomings. Over
the course of 2016, ODIHR published
some 60 election-related reports,
including NAM and interim reports,
statements of preliminary findings
and conclusions, and final reports.
Reports were translated into the official languages of the states observed.
The 17 final reports published this
year included a total of some 370
recommendations.
A delegation from ODIHR, including Director Link (c), observe voting on during the general
elections in Washington D.C., 8 November, 2016. (OSCE/Thomas Rymer)