CONTENTS (Selected decisions—Seventy-fifth to eighty-fourth sessions) Page Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 FINAL DECISIONS A. Decisions declaring a communication inadmissible (the number of the Committee session is indicated in brackets) N° 837/1998 N° 901/1999 N° 939/2000 N° 989/2001 N° 1019/2001 N° 1024/2001 N° 1138/2002 N° 1220/2003 B. [78] [81] [83] [78] [80] [80] [80] [84] Janusz Kolanowski v. Poland........................................... Laing; Deborah, Jessica and Samuel v. Australia ............ Georges Dupuy v. Canada................................................ Walter Kollar v. Austria ................................................... Barcáiztegui v. Spain........................................................ Sanlés Sanlés v. Spain ...................................................... Arenz et al. v. Germany.................................................... Walter Hoffman and Gwen Simpson v. Canada ............. 3 6 16 21 27 35 39 45 Views under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol N° 757/1997 N° 778/1997 N° 781/1997 N° 811/1998 N° 815/1998 N° 823/1998 N° 829/1998 N° 836/1998 N° 848/1999 N° 854/1999 N° 868/1999 N° 875/1999 N° 879/1999 N° 886/1999 N° 900/1999 N° 909/2000 N° 910/2000 N° 916/2000 N° 926/2000 N° 931/2000 N° 932/2000 N° 933/2000 N° 943/2000 N° 950/2000 N° 960/2000 [76] [76] [78] [81] [81] [83] [78] [77] [75] [75] [79] [78] [84] [77] [76] [81] [79] [75] [80] [82] [75] [78] [81] [78] [78] Alzbeta Pezoldova v. Czech Republic ............................. José Antonio Coronel et al. v. Colombia.......................... Azer Aliev v. Ukraine ..................................................... Lallman and Bhartaj Mulai v. Guyana ............................ Alexander Dugin v. Russian Federation .......................... Czernin v. Czech Republic .............................................. Judge v. Canada................................................................ Kestutis Gelazauskas v. Lithuania ................................... Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Orejuela v. Colombia .............. Wackenheim v. France ..................................................... Wilson v. Philippines ....................................................... Jan Filipovich v. Lithuania .............................................. George Howard v. Canada .............................................. Natalia Schedko v. Belarus ............................................. C. v. Australia................................................................... Victor Ivan Majuwana Kankanamge v. Sri Lanka .......... Ati Antoine Randolph v. Togo ........................................ Jayawardena v. Sri Lanka................................................. Hak-Chul Shin v. Republic of Korea .............................. Raihon Hudoyberganova v. Uzbekistan .......................... Marie-Hélène Gillot v. France ......................................... 68 magistrates v. Democratic Republic of the Congo ....... Guido Jakobs v. Belgium ................................................. Sarma v. Sri Lanka ........................................................... Baumgarten v. Germany................................................... iii 51 60 67 72 75 79 85 101 106 110 114 122 126 136 141 157 162 168 172 176 180 194 198 210 218