FINDINGS OF THE MONITORING BY REGION CONCLUSIONS The analysis of monitoring data showed the absence of significant regional specifics of consideration of cases. However, the monitors’ impressions of the consideration of cases in the southern region are slightly better than average. In the central region there were more cases of gross violations of procedure (almost in each tenth case). OBSERVANCE OF THE PROCEDURE 100 9% 6% 3% 4% 46% 48% 52% 40% 80 60 average 40 20 0 poor 45% 46% 45% Centre West East Regarding the observance by the courts of the principles of publicity, impartiality, equality and culture of court proceedings, the courts of the southern region demonstrated somewhat better results (except publicity), while the courts of the western region scored below average. 56% impeccable South OBSERVANCE BY THE COURTS OF THE PRINCIPLES OF PUBLICITY, IMPARTIALITY, EQUALITY AND CULTURE OF COURT PROCEEDINGS 5 Centre 4 West 3 East 2 South   74 MONITORING OF ADHERENCE TO FAIR TRIAL STANDARDS IN UKRAINE