OSCE/ODIHR Opinion on the Law of the Republic of Lithuania on the Seimas Ombudsmen 9) draw up a record of administrative violation of law for failure to comply with the demands of the Seimas Ombudsman or for interfering in any other with the fulfilment by the Seimas Ombudsman of the rights granted to him; 10) apply to the administrative court with a request to investigate conformity of an administrative regulatory enactment (or its part) with the law or Government resolution; 11) propose to the Seimas to apply to the Constitutional Court regarding the conformity of legal acts with the Constitution and laws of the Republic of Lithuania; 12) refer the material to pre-trial investigation body or the prosecutor, if elements of crime are detected; 13) apply to the court for the dismissal of officials guilty of abuse of office or bureaucracy; 14) recommend to the collegial body or official to repeal, suspend or amend the decisions which are contrary to the laws and other legal acts, or propose to adopt decisions the adoption whereof has bee precluded by abuse of office or bureaucracy; 15) recommend to the collegial body, head of the agency or a superior institution or agency to impose disciplinary penalties on the official at fault; 16) recommend to the prosecutor to apply to the court according to the procedure prescribed by law for the protection of public interest; 17) bring to the officials’ attention the facts of negligence in office, non-compliance with laws or other legal acts, violation of professional ethics, abuse of office, bureaucracy or violations of human rights and freedoms and recommend to apply measures to eliminate the violations of laws and other legal acts, their causes and circumstances; 18) propose that material and non-material damage sustained by a person due to the violations committed by the official be compensated in the manner prescribed by law; 19) notify the Seimas, the President of the Republic or the Prime Minister of the violations committed by the ministers or other officials accountable to the Seimas, the President of the Republic or the Government (except for those listed in paragraph 2 of Article 12); 20) recommend to the Chief Official Ethics Commission to evaluate whether or not the official has violated the Law on Adjustment of Public and Private Interests in the Public Service; 21) refraining from the investigation on the merits of a complaint falling outside the remit of the Seimas Ombudsman give proposals or offer commentaries to appropriate 29