76
GENDER PERSPECTIVES ON TORTURE: Law and Practice
Women (Convention of Belém do Pará) and the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish
Torture (IACPPT).
The IACPPT107 holds that the commission of torture is a grave violation that must be investi
gated and punished, providing under Article 6 paragraph 2 that States “shall ensure that all acts
of torture and attempts to commit torture are offenses under their criminal law and shall make
such acts punishable by severe penalties.” Additionally, the Convention Belém do Para states in
article 7b that States parties have the duty to 2b apply due diligence to prevent, investigate and
impose penalties for violence against women. In light of these requirements, the Inter-American
system has established standards in its jurisprudence for the interpretation of the principle of due
diligence in cases of sexual violence and gender-based violence.
The IACHR Court has written that “the duty to investigate is a compulsory obligation of the
State embodied in international law, which cannot be mitigated by any domestic legislation or
act whatsoever.”108 Similarly, in the case of the “Las Dos Erres” Massacre v. Guatemala, the Court
found that “the lack of investigation of grave facts against humane treatment such as torture and
sexual violence in armed conflicts and/or systematic patterns, constitutes a breach of the State’s
obligations in relation to grave human rights violations, which infringe non-revocable laws (jus
cogens) and generate obligations for the States such as investigating and punishing those practices,
in conformity with the American Convention and in this case in light of the [IACPPT] and the
Convention of Belém do Pará.”109
The case of González et al. (“Cotton Field”) v. Mexico, in which the IACHR Court analyzed viola
tions of rights in the case of three young women who were killed in Ciudad Juárez, is particularly
relevant to the investigation of cases of violence against women because of the Court’s interpreta
tion of the concept of gender discrimination. In its judgment, the Court wrote that “the obligation
to investigate effectively has a wider scope when dealing with the case of a woman who is killed
or, ill-treated or, whose personal liberty is affected within the framework of a general context of
violence against women.”110 It further indicated that the State’s actions were characterized by a pat
tern of indifference to the chronic violence against women and children in Ciudad Juárez, perpet
uating the situation of discrimination and sending a message of tolerance and tacit acceptance.111
Notwithstanding these encouraging findings, the IACHR Court did not find the violence commit
ted against women by non-State agents in this case to be torture.
In this judgment, the Court was clear in indicating that States must take comprehensive mea
sures to prevent violence against women and girls in accordance with the American Convention
on Human Rights and the Convention of Belém do Pará.112 This means having an appropriate legal
107
Convención Interamericana Para Prevenir Y Sancionar La Tortura, Article 6. http://www.oas.org/juridico/
spanish/tratados/a-51.html.
108
IACHR Court. Case of Vargas Areco v. Paraguay: Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of September 26,
2006, Series C No. 155, para. 81; Case of Gutiérrez Soler v. Colombia, Judgment of September 12, 2005, Series C.
No. 132, para. 54.
109
IACHR Court. Case of the “Las Dos Erres” Massacre v. Guatemala. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations,
and Costs. Judgment of November 24, 2009, para. 140.
110
IACHR Court. Case of González et al. (“Cotton Field”) v. Mexico. Judgment of November 16, 2009. Preliminary
Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs, para. 293.
111
Cotton Field, op. cit., para. 400.
112
The obligation to carry out investigations with gender perspective is strengthened by Article 7 of the
Convention of Belém do Pará, which establishes that States must “apply due diligence to prevent, investigate
and impose penalties for violence against women.” OAS Department of International Law. Inter-American
Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradication of Violence against Women “Convention of
Belém do Pará.” Article 7, c. Brazil: 1994.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents