30 Type of recommendation / Addressee’s response / Year of receipt Proposal for the elaboration of a government decree Proposal for the amendment of a government decree 2014 2019 total the recommendation was not accepted by the addressee by the deadline, or no substantive response was given 1 1 total 1 1 the recommendation was accepted by the addressee by the deadline 3 3 the recommendation was not accepted by the addressee by the deadline, or no substantive response was given 1 1 the recommendation was partly accepted/partly implemented by the addressee 2 2 not specified 1 1 total 7 7 2 2 2 2 the deadline for the response has not yet expired (e.g. the deadline of the initiative submitted to the superior organ has not expired) 1 1 the recommendation was not accepted by the addressee by the deadline, or no substantive response was given 5 5 the recommendation was partly accepted/partly implemented by the addressee 3 3 total 9 9 the deadline for the addressee's response has been prolonged, or there is a meaningful debate in progress 1 1 Proposal for the creation of the recommendation was accepted by the addressee by the deadline regulatory means for a public law total organisation Proposal for the elaboration of a ministerial decree Proposal for the amendment of a ministerial decree the deadline for the response has not yet expired (e.g. the deadline of the initiative submitted to the superior organ has not expired) Proposal for the amendment of a municipality decree 2 2 the recommendation was accepted by the addressee by the deadline 4 4 the recommendation was not accepted by the addressee by the deadline, or no substantive response was given 4 4 the recommendation was accepted by the addressee with delay (e.g. no response was given, but the recommendation was implemented) 4 4 the recommendation was not accepted by the addressee by the delayed deadline, or no substantive response was given 1 1 the recommendation was partly accepted/partly implemented by the addressee 1 1 15 17 the recommendation was accepted by the addressee by the deadline 1 1 total 1 1 the recommendation was accepted by the addressee by the deadline 2 2 the recommendation was accepted by the addressee with delay (e.g. no response was given, but the recommendation was implemented) 1 1 the recommendation was not accepted by the addressee by the prolonged deadline, or no substantive response was given 1 1 total 4 4 total Proposal for the amendment of a decree issued by the head of an independent regulatory agency 2018 REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF HUNGARY AND HIS DEPUTIES – 2019 2